These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7790831)

  • 1. Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks.
    Jordon TR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):512-30. PubMed ID: 7790831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word superiority over isolated letters: the neglected case of forward masking.
    Jordan TR; Bevan KM
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8035690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.
    Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 1594437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM; Patching GR; Scott-Brown KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):883-93. PubMed ID: 14516221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reading isolated words: no evidence for automatic incorporation of the phonetic code.
    Brysbaert M; Praet C
    Psychol Res; 1992; 54(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 1620802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The PIG in sPrInG: evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words.
    Humphreys GW; Mayall K; Cooper AC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 15000542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: effects of positional letter frequency.
    Grainger J; Jacobs AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Oct; 19(5):951-64. PubMed ID: 8228845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition?
    Perea M; Marcet A; Fernández-López M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2295-2300. PubMed ID: 29392634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lateral masking: limitations of the feature interaction account.
    Huckauf A; Heller D; Nazir TA
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):177-89. PubMed ID: 10070209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of masked repetition priming and orthographic neighborhood in visual recognition of words.
    Perea M; Gotor A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 8873189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Episodic effects on the visual comparison of letters in words.
    Marmurek HH
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Nov; 52(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 1437488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual versus postperceptual mediation of visual context effects: evidence from the letter-superiority effect.
    Reingold EM; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Feb; 53(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 8433915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition.
    Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: a reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006).
    Lleras A; Enns JT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 16846278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition.
    Lanthier SN; Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19145012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.