These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7790833)
21. The dimensionality of the flanker compatibility effect: a psychophysiological analysis. Fournier LR; Scheffers MK; Coles MG; Adamson A; Abad EV Psychol Res; 1997; 60(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 9342958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dual-tasking with simple linguistic tasks: Evidence for serial processing. Fairs A; Bögels S; Meyer AS Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():131-148. PubMed ID: 30268022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mental rotation impairs attention shifting and short-term memory encoding: neurophysiological evidence against the response-selection bottleneck model of dual-task performance. Pannebakker MM; Jolicœur P; van Dam WO; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR; Hommel B Neuropsychologia; 2011 Sep; 49(11):2985-93. PubMed ID: 21736889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A hemispheric division of labor aids mental rotation. Yoshizaki K; Weissman DH; Banich MT Neuropsychology; 2007 May; 21(3):326-36. PubMed ID: 17484596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach. Mattes A; Tavera F; Ophey A; Roheger M; Gaschler R; Haider H Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1529-1552. PubMed ID: 32335762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An AFM investigation of the effects of acute hypoxia on mental rotation. Lindeis AE; Nathoo A; Fowler B Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 8851532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: uncoupling of lateralized response codes. Ivry RB; Franz EA; Kingstone A; Johnston JC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):463-80. PubMed ID: 9554094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. Pashler H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1023-40. PubMed ID: 1837295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does size rescaling require central attention? Tombu M; Jolicoeur P Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 11901957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Miller J; Ulrich R; Rolke B Cogn Psychol; 2009 May; 58(3):273-310. PubMed ID: 19281972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing]. Hildebrandt H; Fresenborg I; Engel A Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evidence for premotor cortex activity during dynamic visuospatial imagery from single-trial functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related slow cortical potentials. Lamm C; Windischberger C; Leodolter U; Moser E; Bauer H Neuroimage; 2001 Aug; 14(2):268-83. PubMed ID: 11467902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Two routes to expertise in mental rotation. Provost A; Johnson B; Karayanidis F; Brown SD; Heathcote A Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(7):1321-42. PubMed ID: 23676091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]