These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7790835)

  • 21. Attribute conjunctions and the part configuration advantage in object category learning.
    Saiki J; Hummel JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Jul; 22(4):1002-19. PubMed ID: 8708600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The time course of perception and retrieval in matching and recognition.
    Kent C; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):920-31. PubMed ID: 16846288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words.
    Viswanathan M; Childers TL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):267-87. PubMed ID: 12705535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Activating representations in permanent memory: different benefits for pictures and words.
    Seifert LS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1106-21. PubMed ID: 9293624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Integration trumps selection in object recognition.
    Saarela TP; Landy MS
    Curr Biol; 2015 Mar; 25(7):920-7. PubMed ID: 25802154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of semantic priming on visual encoding of pictures.
    Reinitz MT; Wright E; Loftus GR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Sep; 118(3):280-97. PubMed ID: 2527951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.
    Carr TH; McCauley C; Sperber RD; Parmelee CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):757-77. PubMed ID: 6218234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.
    Perlman A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Verbalizing events: overshadowing or facilitation?
    Huff M; Schwan S
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 18426068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding priming of color-singleton search: roles of attention at encoding and "retrieval".
    Goolsby BA; Suzuki S
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):929-44. PubMed ID: 11578055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Rasmussen IP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 20515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inattention and the perception of visual feature conjunctions.
    Modigliani V; Wright RD; Loverock DS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1996 Mar; 91(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8677805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Space, object, and task selection.
    Lachter J; Remington RW; Ruthruff E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):995-1014. PubMed ID: 19525533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Processing the presence, placement, and properties of a distractor in spatial language tasks.
    Carlson LA; Hill PL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):240-55. PubMed ID: 18426058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception.
    Johnston JC; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 2148596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.
    McConkie GW; Currie CB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):563-81. PubMed ID: 8666953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pigeons see correspondence between objects and their pictures.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):966-72. PubMed ID: 17176429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.