These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7790838)

  • 1. Auditory coding, cues, and coherence in phonetic perception.
    Sawusch JR; Gagnon DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):635-52. PubMed ID: 7790838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discovering phonetic coherence in acoustic patterns.
    Best CT; Studdert-Kennedy M; Manuel S; Rubin-Spitz J
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Mar; 45(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 2710622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automaticity in speech perception: some speech/nonspeech comparisons.
    Johnson K; Ralston JV
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):195-209. PubMed ID: 7938203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):349-66. PubMed ID: 11999859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual context effects of speech and nonspeech sounds: the role of auditory categories.
    Aravamudhan R; Lotto AJ; Hawks JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1695-703. PubMed ID: 19045660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners' perception of /r/ and /l/.
    Iverson P; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 8609297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.
    Benson RR; Richardson M; Whalen DH; Lai S
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):342-53. PubMed ID: 16530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of intraphonemic differences by phoneticians, musicians, and inexperienced listeners.
    Hillenbrand J; Canter GJ; Smith BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):655-62. PubMed ID: 2212288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between inexperienced listeners' perceptions and acoustic correlates of children's /r/ productions.
    Klein HB; Grigos MI; McAllister Byun T; Davidson L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Jul; 26(7):628-45. PubMed ID: 22690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of prominence by Estonian and English listeners.
    Lehiste I; Fox RA
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():419-34. PubMed ID: 1339921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues.
    Francis AL; Baldwin K; Nusbaum HC
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Nov; 62(8):1668-80. PubMed ID: 11140187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic-phonetic and auditory mechanisms of adaptation in the perception of sibilant fricatives.
    Chodroff E; Wilson C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2027-2048. PubMed ID: 31875314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling the judgment of vowel quality differences.
    Bladon RA; Lindblom B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 May; 69(5):1414-22. PubMed ID: 7240572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coherence in children's speech perception.
    Nittrouer S; Crowther CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2129-40. PubMed ID: 11681390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners.
    Surprenant AM; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2085-95. PubMed ID: 11681386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus presentation order and the perception of lexical tones in Cantonese.
    Francis AL; Ciocca V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1611-21. PubMed ID: 14514214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers.
    Junqua JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):510-24. PubMed ID: 8423266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.