These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7791462)

  • 1. Threat to German cancer-screening plan.
    Robra BP
    Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1574. PubMed ID: 7791462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Concept and implementation of model projects for mammography screening in Germany].
    Junkermann H; Becker N; Peitgen HO
    Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 11388053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative estimates of the impact of sensitivity and specificity in mammographic screening in Germany.
    Warmerdam PG; de Koning HJ; Boer R; Beemsterboer PM; Dierks ML; Swart E; Robra BP
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Apr; 51(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 9196649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reform of the National Screening Mammography Program in France.
    Barratt A; Jørgensen KJ; Autier P
    JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 178(2):177-178. PubMed ID: 29084317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Screening for breast cancer: the time of decision].
    Gordenne W
    J Belge Radiol; 1998 Apr; 81(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 9640877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography.
    Ellis RL
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Breast cancer screening. In search of more quality].
    Wegner A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Jun; 143(23):12. PubMed ID: 11460411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Plans of the German Roentgen Society and the Professional Association for Quality Assurance in Mammography].
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH
    Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 11388056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mammography screening in Germany].
    Mödder U
    Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):327. PubMed ID: 11388052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
    Patti J; Lee C
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. PubMed ID: 20851948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Grivegnée AR; Autier P
    Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
    Berlin L; Hall FM
    Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20413746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A decentralized breast cancer screening program in the French department of Bas-Rhin].
    Schaffer P; Gairard B; Guldenfels C; Haehnel P; Dale G; Bellocq JP; Renaud R
    J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 81(8):845-57. PubMed ID: 10916002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening for breast cancer. Recommendations are costly and short sighted.
    Thornton H
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6985):1002. PubMed ID: 7727991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
    Iinuma T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography in Mexico Through a Simulation.
    Ulloa-Pérez E; Mohar-Betancourt A; Reynoso-Noverón N
    Rev Invest Clin; 2016; 68(4):184-91. PubMed ID: 27623037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
    Evans WP; Lee CH; Monsees BS; Monticciolo DL; Rebner M
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):297; author reply 297-8. PubMed ID: 20851949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasound and mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Magee BD
    JAMA; 2008 Oct; 300(13):1514; author reply 1515. PubMed ID: 18827204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.