These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7791597)

  • 41. Visual word expertise: a study of inversion and the word-length effect, with perceptual transforms.
    Björnström LE; Hills C; Hanif H; Barton JJ
    Perception; 2014; 43(5):438-50. PubMed ID: 25109010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: concepts and data.
    Hunt RR; Toth JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 2137867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Distinctiveness in serial memory for spatial information.
    Guérard K; Neath I; Surprenant AM; Tremblay S
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 19966241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency.
    Segui J; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 2137524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does the effect of familiarity on proofreading change with encoding task and time?
    Pilotti M; Maxwell K; Chodorow M
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jul; 133(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 16937896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In search of perceptual priming in a semantic classification task.
    Bowers JS; Turner EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1248-55. PubMed ID: 14622058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Clark SE; Shin HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):282-304. PubMed ID: 2522517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16371137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Letter-specific processing in children and adults matched for reading level.
    Burgund ED; Abernathy AE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18544449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: no evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure.
    Johansson T
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):188-97. PubMed ID: 19289361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of stimulus duration, temporal delay, and complexity on the judgments of dot location.
    Hanari T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 8724916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual perceptual and working memory impairments in schizophrenia.
    Tek C; Gold J; Blaxton T; Wilk C; McMahon RP; Buchanan RW
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2002 Feb; 59(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 11825136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?
    Richler JJ; Tanaka JW; Brown DD; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1356-68. PubMed ID: 18980400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. On-line processing of textual illustrations in the visuospatial sketchpad: evidence from dual-task studies.
    Kruley P; Sciama SC; Glenberg AM
    Mem Cognit; 1994 May; 22(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 8007830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.
    Rogers TT; Lambon Ralph MA; Garrard P; Bozeat S; McClelland JL; Hodges JR; Patterson K
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):205-35. PubMed ID: 14756594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The impact of orienting attention in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):648-60. PubMed ID: 22287208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy.
    Konar Y; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 20424020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.