BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7791690)

  • 1. Electrical impedance for estimation of irritation in oral mucosa and skin.
    Ollmar S; Eek A; Sundström F; Emtestam L
    Med Prog Technol; 1995; 21(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 7791690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical impedance applied to non-invasive detection of irritation in skin.
    Ollmar S; Emtestam L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Jul; 27(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 1424589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical impedance for quantification and classification of experimental skin reactions.
    Emtestam L; Nyrén M
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Dec; 8(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9358110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical impedance compared with other non-invasive bioengineering techniques and visual scoring for detection of irritation in human skin.
    Ollmar S; Nyrén M; Nicander I; Emtestam L
    Br J Dermatol; 1994 Jan; 130(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 8305313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical impedance model for evaluation of skin irritation in rabbits and humans.
    Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17610647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
    Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
    Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The irritant potential of n-propanol (nonanoic acid vehicle) in cumulative skin irritation: a validation study of two different human in vivo test models.
    Clemmensen A; Andersen F; Petersen TK; Kalden H; Melgaard A; Andersen KE
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 19159372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis.
    Emtestam L; Ollmar S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Feb; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 8458202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive measurement of the electrical bioimpedance of breast tumors.
    Ohmine Y; Morimoto T; Kinouchi Y; Iritani T; Takeuchi M; Monden Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1941-6. PubMed ID: 10928131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part II. Evaluation evaluation of skin irritation potential of chemicals].
    Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 19746889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test.
    Basketter DA; York M; McFadden JP; Robinson MK
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15291823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of acute skin irritation in rabbits using electrical impedance model.
    Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1665-8. PubMed ID: 17945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Final report on the safety assessment of capsicum annuum extract, capsicum annuum fruit extract, capsicum annuum resin, capsicum annuum fruit powder, capsicum frutescens fruit, capsicum frutescens fruit extract, capsicum frutescens resin, and capsaicin.
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 1():3-106. PubMed ID: 17365137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The functional assessment of the upper urinary tract by the methods of 2-frequency impedance measurement and multichannel impedance ureterography].
    Mudraia IS; Kirpatovskiĭ VI
    Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1993; (5):4-9. PubMed ID: 8310585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of objective and sensory skin irritations of several cosmetic preservatives.
    Lee E; An S; Choi D; Moon S; Chang I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Mar; 56(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 17295686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irritant contact stomatitis: a review of the condition.
    Davis CC; Squier CA; Lilly GE
    J Periodontol; 1998 Jun; 69(6):620-31. PubMed ID: 9660330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of two sodium lauryl sulphate-containing toothpastes with and without betaine on human oral mucosa in vivo.
    Rantanen I; Jutila K; Nicander I; Tenovuo J; Söderling E
    Swed Dent J; 2003; 27(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 12704946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosing diseases by measurement of electrical skin impedance: a novel technique.
    Weitzen R; Epstein N; Shoenfeld Y; Zimlichman E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Aug; 1109():185-92. PubMed ID: 17785305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
    Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.