223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7793707)
1. Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules.
Lucchesi GM; Jackson RE; Peacock WF; Cerasani C; Swor RA
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7793707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can clinical prediction rules used in acute pediatric ankle and midfoot injuries be applied to an adult population?
Smith KR; Brown CK; Brewer KL
Am J Emerg Med; 2011 May; 29(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 21450433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.
Papacostas E; Malliaropoulos N; Papadopoulos A; Liouliakis C
Br J Sports Med; 2001 Dec; 35(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 11726486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
Libetta C; Burke D; Brennan P; Yassa J
J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 16(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 10505914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study of modified Ottawa ankle rules in a military population. Interobserver agreement between physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons.
Springer BA; Arciero RA; Tenuta JJ; Taylor DC
Am J Sports Med; 2000; 28(6):864-8. PubMed ID: 11101110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: a study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital.
Auleley GR; Kerboull L; Durieux P; Cosquer M; Courpied JP; Ravaud P
Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Jul; 32(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9656943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules.
Pijnenburg AC; Glas AS; De Roos MA; Bogaard K; Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Butzelaar RM; Keeman JN
Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 39(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 12023701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy of bedside ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for fractures in the ankle and foot.
Atilla OD; Yesilaras M; Kilic TY; Tur FC; Reisoglu A; Sever M; Aksay E
Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1058-61. PubMed ID: 25269589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules for midfoot and ankle injuries.
Yavas S; Arslan ED; Ozkan S; Yilmaz Aydin Y; Aydin M
Acta Biomed; 2021 Sep; 92(4):e2021241. PubMed ID: 34487104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Ottawa Ankle Rules in Asia: validating a clinical decision rule for requesting X-rays in twisting ankle and foot injuries.
Tay SY; Thoo FL; Sitoh YY; Seow E; Wong HP
J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(6):945-7. PubMed ID: 10595876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Worthington JR
Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Apr; 21(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 1554175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Australia.
Broomhead A; Stuart P
Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2003 Apr; 15(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 12675622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.
Ashurst JV; Nappe T; Digiambattista S; Kambhampati A; Alam S; Ortiz M; Delpais P; Porter BG; Kurt A; Kane BG; Greenberg MR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Dec; 114(12):890-7. PubMed ID: 25429079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.
Bachmann LM; Kolb E; Koller MT; Steurer J; ter Riet G
BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7386):417. PubMed ID: 12595378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children with ankle injuries.
Plint AC; Bulloch B; Osmond MH; Stiell I; Dunlap H; Reed M; Tenenbein M; Klassen TP
Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Oct; 6(10):1005-9. PubMed ID: 10530658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis.
Dowling S; Spooner CH; Liang Y; Dryden DM; Friesen C; Klassen TP; Wright RB
Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 19187397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
