These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7793707)

  • 41. Failed validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injury.
    Kelly AM; Richards D; Kerr L; Grant J; O'Donovan P; Basire K; Graham R
    N Z Med J; 1994 Jul; 107(982):294-5. PubMed ID: 8093158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Minimising negative ankle and foot X-rays in the Emergency Department -- are the Ottawa ankle rules good enough?
    Crosswell S; Leaman A; Phung W
    Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2002-4. PubMed ID: 25257400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department.
    Lau LH; Kerr D; Law I; Ritchie P
    Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2013 Aug; 16(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 23953094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Can we safely apply the Ottawa Ankle Rules to children?
    Runyon MS
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(4):352-4. PubMed ID: 19456297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Safety and efficiency of the Ottawa Ankle Rule in a Swiss population with ankle sprains.
    Can U; Ruckert R; Held U; Buchmann P; Platz A; Bachmann LM
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2008 May; 138(19-20):292-6. PubMed ID: 18491243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
    Anis AH; Stiell IG; Stewart DG; Laupacis A
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Oct; 26(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 7574122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle and Midfoot Rules: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Beckenkamp PR; Lin CC; Macaskill P; Michaleff ZA; Maher CG; Moseley AM
    Br J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 51(6):504-510. PubMed ID: 27884861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Relevance of adjacent joint imaging in the evaluation of ankle fractures.
    Antoci V; Patel SP; Weaver MJ; Kwon JY
    Injury; 2016 Oct; 47(10):2366-2369. PubMed ID: 27465987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population.
    Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
    Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
    BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Application of the Ottawa ankle rules in the ankle and midfoot injuries: verification of the method on the basis of own material].
    Szczesny G; Sypniewski M; Deszczyński J
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1999; 64(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 10575796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The added value of cross-sectional imaging in the detection of additional radiographically occult fractures in the setting of a Chopart fracture.
    Almeida RR; Mansouri M; Tso DK; Johnson AH; Lev MH; Singh AK; Flores EJ
    Emerg Radiol; 2018 Oct; 25(5):513-520. PubMed ID: 29876712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle Rules applied by non-physician providers in a pediatric emergency department.
    MacLellan J; Smith T; Baserman J; Dowling S
    CJEM; 2018 Sep; 20(5):746-752. PubMed ID: 28965519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A pooled analysis of the Ottawa ankle rules used on adults in the ED.
    Markert RJ; Walley ME; Guttman TG; Mehta R
    Am J Emerg Med; 1998 Oct; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 9786538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rule to exclude fractures in acute ankle injuries in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gomes YE; Chau M; Banwell HA; Causby RS
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Sep; 23(1):885. PubMed ID: 36151550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Efficiency of the Modified Ottawa ankle rules for the differential diagnosis of fracture in acute foot and ankle injury].
    Li N; Liu YS; Xin JY; Ma XL; Mei XL; Shi ZQ; Li G; Sun ZH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 97(35):2742-2745. PubMed ID: 28954331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for Acute Foot and Ankle Injuries.
    David S; Gray K; Russell JA; Starkey C
    J Sport Rehabil; 2016 Feb; 25(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 26262468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical application of the Ottawa ankle rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: an independent site assessment.
    Verma S; Hamilton K; Hawkins HH; Kothari R; Singal B; Buncher R; Nguyen P; O'Neill M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):825-7. PubMed ID: 9275906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
    Clark KD; Tanner S
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2003 Apr; 19(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12698029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Derivation of clinical prediction rules to identify children with fractures after twisting injuries of the ankle.
    Dayan PS; Vitale M; Langsam DJ; Ruzal-Shapiro C; Novick MK; Kuppermann N; Miller SZ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jul; 11(7):736-43. PubMed ID: 15231460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.