These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7793717)

  • 1. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization.
    Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of perceived pain with different immobilization techniques.
    Cross DA; Baskerville J
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2001; 5(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 11446541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
    Hemmes B; Poeze M; Brink PR
    J Trauma; 2010 Mar; 68(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 19918198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of neutral positioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects.
    Lerner EB; Billittier AJ; Moscati RM
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1998; 2(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 9709329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of unconsciousness during spinal immobilization on tissue-interface pressures: A randomized controlled trial comparing a standard rigid spineboard with a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
    Hemmes B; Brink PR; Poeze M
    Injury; 2014 Nov; 45(11):1741-6. PubMed ID: 24998039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board.
    Pernik MN; Seidel HH; Blalock RE; Burgess AR; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR; Prasarn ML
    Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1801-5. PubMed ID: 27324323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study.
    Ms R; Riffelmann M; Kunze-Szikszay N; Lier M; Schmid O; Haus H; Schneider S; Jf H
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 Mar; 29(1):46. PubMed ID: 33706791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8031686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Padded vs unpadded spine board for cervical spine immobilization.
    Walton R; DeSalvo JF; Ernst AA; Shahane A
    Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Aug; 2(8):725-8. PubMed ID: 7584752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of body pressure distribution in healthy subjects between bubble wrap and an emergency mattress laid on a cardboard bed: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
    Hamanishi S; Asada Y; Ikushima Y; Ikeda Y; Chinushi M
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15173. PubMed ID: 37020853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tissue-interface pressures on three different support-surfaces for trauma patients.
    Keller BP; Lubbert PH; Keller E; Leenen LP
    Injury; 2005 Aug; 36(8):946-8. PubMed ID: 16023909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of a new clinical mattress solution on interface pressure and comfort during supine lying.
    Webb JA; Chohan A
    J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(8):513-518. PubMed ID: 37572343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of contact pressures measured at the sacrum of young and elderly subjects.
    Clark M; Rowland LB
    J Biomed Eng; 1989 May; 11(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 2724940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interface pressure characteristics of alternating air cell mattresses in persons with spinal cord injury.
    Goetz LL; Brown GS; Priebe MM
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2002; 25(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 12214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A New Craniothoracic Mattress for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine in Critical Care Patients.
    Holla M; Driessen M; Eggen TGE; Daanen RA; Hosman AJF; Verdonschot N; Hannink G
    J Trauma Nurs; 2017; 24(4):261-269. PubMed ID: 28692625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the effectiveness of assisted turning mattresses and conventional air mattresses in relieving body pressure in different lying positions.
    Wu SV; Kuo LM; Tsai JM; Lin LJ; Chu CH; Liao YY
    Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 36(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 36445182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The occipital and sacral pressures experienced by healthy volunteers under spinal immobilization: a trial of three surfaces.
    Sheerin F; de Frein R
    J Emerg Nurs; 2007 Oct; 33(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 17884474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of a Liner on the Dispersion of Sacral Interface Pressures During Spinal Immobilization.
    Nemunaitis G; Roach MJ; Boulet M; Nagy JA; Kaufman B; Mejia M; Hefzy MS
    Assist Technol; 2015; 27(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 26132220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization.
    Totten VY; Sugarman DB
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1999; 3(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 10534038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.