228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7793717)
1. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization.
Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of perceived pain with different immobilization techniques.
Cross DA; Baskerville J
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2001; 5(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 11446541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
Hemmes B; Poeze M; Brink PR
J Trauma; 2010 Mar; 68(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 19918198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of neutral positioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects.
Lerner EB; Billittier AJ; Moscati RM
Prehosp Emerg Care; 1998; 2(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 9709329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of unconsciousness during spinal immobilization on tissue-interface pressures: A randomized controlled trial comparing a standard rigid spineboard with a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
Hemmes B; Brink PR; Poeze M
Injury; 2014 Nov; 45(11):1741-6. PubMed ID: 24998039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board.
Pernik MN; Seidel HH; Blalock RE; Burgess AR; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR; Prasarn ML
Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1801-5. PubMed ID: 27324323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study.
Ms R; Riffelmann M; Kunze-Szikszay N; Lier M; Schmid O; Haus H; Schneider S; Jf H
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 Mar; 29(1):46. PubMed ID: 33706791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.
Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8031686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Padded vs unpadded spine board for cervical spine immobilization.
Walton R; DeSalvo JF; Ernst AA; Shahane A
Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Aug; 2(8):725-8. PubMed ID: 7584752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of body pressure distribution in healthy subjects between bubble wrap and an emergency mattress laid on a cardboard bed: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
Hamanishi S; Asada Y; Ikushima Y; Ikeda Y; Chinushi M
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15173. PubMed ID: 37020853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue-interface pressures on three different support-surfaces for trauma patients.
Keller BP; Lubbert PH; Keller E; Leenen LP
Injury; 2005 Aug; 36(8):946-8. PubMed ID: 16023909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of a new clinical mattress solution on interface pressure and comfort during supine lying.
Webb JA; Chohan A
J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(8):513-518. PubMed ID: 37572343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of contact pressures measured at the sacrum of young and elderly subjects.
Clark M; Rowland LB
J Biomed Eng; 1989 May; 11(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 2724940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interface pressure characteristics of alternating air cell mattresses in persons with spinal cord injury.
Goetz LL; Brown GS; Priebe MM
J Spinal Cord Med; 2002; 25(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 12214903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A New Craniothoracic Mattress for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine in Critical Care Patients.
Holla M; Driessen M; Eggen TGE; Daanen RA; Hosman AJF; Verdonschot N; Hannink G
J Trauma Nurs; 2017; 24(4):261-269. PubMed ID: 28692625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the effectiveness of assisted turning mattresses and conventional air mattresses in relieving body pressure in different lying positions.
Wu SV; Kuo LM; Tsai JM; Lin LJ; Chu CH; Liao YY
Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 36(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 36445182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The occipital and sacral pressures experienced by healthy volunteers under spinal immobilization: a trial of three surfaces.
Sheerin F; de Frein R
J Emerg Nurs; 2007 Oct; 33(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 17884474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of a Liner on the Dispersion of Sacral Interface Pressures During Spinal Immobilization.
Nemunaitis G; Roach MJ; Boulet M; Nagy JA; Kaufman B; Mejia M; Hefzy MS
Assist Technol; 2015; 27(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 26132220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization.
Totten VY; Sugarman DB
Prehosp Emerg Care; 1999; 3(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 10534038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
