212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7794199)
1. Mental health law: an idea whose time has passed.
Rosenman S
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 28(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 7794199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mental health law: institutionalised discrimination.
Campbell TD
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 28(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 7794198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reform of "hogosha" system and psychiatric practice in Japan.
Shiraishi H
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 48 Suppl():117-24. PubMed ID: 7799536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Balancing autonomy and risk: a failure of nerve in England and Wales?
Richardson G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 17141872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Thiel A, Röttgers H.R. Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation. Psychiat Prax 2006; 33: 196-201].
Dreyer J
Psychiatr Prax; 2006 Sep; 33(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 16944443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The operation of the Mental Health Act, 1983 (NSW).
Errington MR
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1986 Sep; 20(3):278-92. PubMed ID: 3467708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental health law reform: advance towards enlightenment or denial of reality?
Doutney C
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1986 Sep; 20(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 3467707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quebec law on the protection of mentally ill patients: desirable modifications].
Morissette L
Can J Psychiatry; 1987 Nov; 32(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 3690488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Need for treatment and New York's revised commitment laws: an empirical assessment.
Mestrovic S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 6642827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Capacity, consent, and mental health legislation: time for a new standard?
O'Brien AJ
Contemp Nurse; 2010; 34(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 20509808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill.
Sadoff RL
Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 7216207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The Welfare Act and its predictive effects in Public Health Service].
Wolf A
Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1990; 52(8-9):534-9. PubMed ID: 2146570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rights of the patient vs. rights of the public in the "Treatment of the Mentally Ill Law--1991".
Bazak J
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 7558765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preserving personal autonomy for the elderly. Competency, guardianship, and Alzheimer's disease.
Rosoff AJ; Gottlieb GL
J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 3495620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [What is the impact of the dispositions of July 5, 2011 on care, 2 years after?].
Vacheron MN
Encephale; 2014 Apr; 40(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 24060379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Who is to protect the rights of hospitalized mental patients?
Ginath Y
Med Law; 1993; 12(3-5):287-90. PubMed ID: 8231696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The revision of the mental health commitment law in Belgium: the medical viewpoint.
Lecompte D; Pelc I; Szafran W; Abeloos MT
Med Law; 1993; 12(3-5):305-9. PubMed ID: 8231699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Patient consent and psychiatric emergency care. Inclusions and non-inclusions of the 27 June 1990 law].
Pichene C; Patault AM; Guillemot-Guerci A; Laxenaire M
Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1992; 150(6):427-8; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 1342772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The imminent peril in the law of July the fifth 2011, two years later: the impact on health?].
Mondoloni A; Buard M; Nargeot J; Vacheron MN
Encephale; 2014 Dec; 40(6):468-73. PubMed ID: 24703930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coercion in civil commitment: process, preferences, and outcome.
Hiday VA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(4):359-77. PubMed ID: 1428420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
