These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7794300)

  • 1. The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate.
    Macara LM; Murphy KW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 171(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 7794300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indications for cesarean section in singleton pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.
    Sperling LS; Henriksen TB; Ulrichsen H; Hedegård M; Møller H; Hansen V; Ovlisen B; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Feb; 73(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 8116351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dystocia: is it a major indication for caesarean section?
    Abu-Heija A; el-Jallad F; Ziadeh S
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 25(1-2):51-3. PubMed ID: 9743883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Indications for cesarean section].
    Stoll W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1990 Feb; 120(8):255-9. PubMed ID: 2408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.
    Notzon FC; Cnattingius S; Bergsjø P; Cole S; Taffel S; Irgens L; Daltveit AK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 8116703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.
    Gregory KD; Curtin SC; Taffel SM; Notzon FC
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1384-7. PubMed ID: 9736883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.
    Zhang J; Troendle J; Reddy UM; Laughon SK; Branch DW; Burkman R; Landy HJ; Hibbard JU; Haberman S; Ramirez MM; Bailit JL; Hoffman MK; Gregory KD; Gonzalez-Quintero VH; Kominiarek M; Learman LA; Hatjis CG; van Veldhuisen P;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 203(4):326.e1-326.e10. PubMed ID: 20708166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing rates and indications for cesarean sections at a community hospital from 1972 to 1979.
    Sehgal NN
    J Community Health; 1981; 7(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 7320229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean section rates and indications in Greece: data from a 24-year period in a teaching hospital.
    Tampakoudis P; Assimakopoulos E; Grimbizis G; Zafrakas M; Tampakoudis G; Mantalenakis S; Bontis J
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2004; 31(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 15672970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates.
    Robson MS; Scudamore IW; Walsh SM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):199-205. PubMed ID: 8572006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changing caesarean section rates. Experience at a Sydney obstetric teaching hospital.
    Blumenthal NJ; Harris RS; O'Connor MC; Lancaster PA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Nov; 24(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 6598375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean section in twin pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.
    Henriksen TB; Sperling L; Hedegaard M; Ulrichsen H; Ovlisen B; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Feb; 73(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8116350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.
    Mayne L; Liu C; Tanaka K; Amoako A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 33938362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesarean section: changing incidence and indications.
    Gilstrap LC; Hauth JC; Toussaint S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 6694814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.
    Saunders LD; Flowerdew G
    CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(10):1243-9, 1252. PubMed ID: 2025819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reversing the upward trend in the cesarean section rate.
    Peter J; Amir W; Eitan P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Jun; 25(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3609425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.