BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7794320)

  • 1. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.
    Shildkraut M; Wood DP; Hunter WS
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7794320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
    Cordray FE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrepancies between centric occlusion and centric relation in orthodontically treated patients.
    Gaither EL; Sadowsky PL; Vlachos CC; Wallace DD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 9456615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique.
    Wood DP; Elliott RW
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 8060017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between centric relation–maximum intercuspation discrepancy and temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
    He SS; Deng X; Wamalwa P; Chen S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Nov; 68(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 20942605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentofacial characteristics in orthodontic patients with centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy.
    Lim WH; Choi B; Lee JY; Ahn SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):939-45. PubMed ID: 24673658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A three-dimensional comparison of condylar position changes between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator.
    Utt TW; Meyers CE; Wierzba TF; Hondrum SO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 7879763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of the mandibular position in malocclusion patients.
    He H; Fu M
    Chin J Dent Res; 2000 May; 3(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11314339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
    Crawford SD
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):103-15; discussion 115-6. PubMed ID: 10227550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillo- mandibular relationship--a cephalometric study.
    Kapoor DN; Chandana A; Tandon S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Sep; 22(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 15573662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records.
    Karl PJ; Foley TF
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):117-24; discussion 124-5. PubMed ID: 10227551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of condylar position in symptomatic (TMJ dysfunction) and asymptomatic individuals.
    Padala S; Padmanabhan S; Chithranjan AB
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):122. PubMed ID: 22842268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Movement between centric relation contact position and the intercuspal position.
    Wise MD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 1520455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Purpose of CR-CO study clear.
    Williams RE
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 7639429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The CR-CO interchange.
    Parker WS
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):164. PubMed ID: 7639427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of mandibular position of patients with angles Class I and Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
    He H; Fu M
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 36(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 11769653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
    Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of condylar position in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent facial skeletal types.
    Girardot RA
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Aug; 71(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 11510632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Method to verify the accuracy of model surgery and prediction tracing.
    Omura T; Glickman RS; Super S
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 9456630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques.
    Keshvad A; Winstanley RB
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):90-101. PubMed ID: 12964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.