122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7795169)
1. DNA quantification is technically feasible and of value in cervical smear samples: possible applications for determination of progression in low grade dyskaryosis.
Walsh CB; Thornhill M; Kay E; Whelan D; Barry D; Turner M; Prendiville W; Leader M
Cytopathology; 1995 Apr; 6(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 7795169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicability of liquid-based cytology to the assessment of DNA content in cervical lesions using static cytometry.
Shirata NK; Longatto Filho A; Roteli-Martins C; Espoladore LM; Pittoli JE; Syrjänen K
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Aug; 25(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 12961827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuclear DNA content analysis by static cytometry in cervical intraepithelial lesions using retrospective series of previously stained PAP smears.
Shirata NK; Gomes NS; Garcia EA; Longatto Filho A
Adv Clin Path; 2001 Jul; 5(3):87-91. PubMed ID: 11753880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA ploidy in cervical lesions assessed by computed image analysis: relation to histopathology.
Shirata NK; Zerbini MC; Longatto Filho A; de Mello ES; Arias V; Nonogaki S; Alves VA
Pathologica; 2003 Apr; 95(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 12768877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of image cytometric DNA ploidy measurement in cytological samples of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Demirel D; Akyürek N; Ramzy I
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 23331643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Significance of DNA ploidy analysis in diagnosis of ASCUS].
Zhang DL; Yang Y; Zhou LM
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 22781111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The suitability of DNA cytometry for the prediction of the histological diagnosis in women with abnormal cervical smears.
van Leeuwen AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ; Pieters WJ; Hollema H; Burger MP
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Apr; 103(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 8605134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value of morphological nuclear parameters and DNA ploidy pattern in precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Kashyap V; Luthra UK
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 38(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 8919109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contribution of DNA ploidy image cytometry to the management of ASC cervical lesions.
Lorenzato M; Caudroy S; Nou JM; Dalstein V; Joseph K; Bellefqih S; Durlach A; Thil C; Dez F; Bouttens D; Clavel C; Birembaut P
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 114(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 18618504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. p16INK4A as a marker for cervical dyskaryosis: CIN and cGIN in cervical biopsies and ThinPrep smears.
Murphy N; Ring M; Killalea AG; Uhlmann V; O'Donovan M; Mulcahy F; Turner M; McGuinness E; Griffin M; Martin C; Sheils O; O'Leary JJ
J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 56(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12499437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [DNA-cytometry in dysplasias of the uterine cervix].
Bollmann R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11370528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cell cycle and/or proliferation markers: what is the best method to discriminate cervical high-grade lesions?
Lorenzato M; Caudroy S; Bronner C; Evrard G; Simon M; Durlach A; Birembaut P; Clavel C
Hum Pathol; 2005 Oct; 36(10):1101-7. PubMed ID: 16226110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytometric evidence that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and II are dysplasias rather than true neoplasias. An image analysis study of factors involved in the progression of cervical lesions.
Mariuzzi G; Santinelli A; Valli M; Sisti S; Montironi R; Mariuzzi L; Alberti R; Pisani E
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1992 Apr; 14(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 1590897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determinants of high-grade dysplasia among women with mild dyskaryosis on cervical smear.
Parazzini F; Sideri M; Restelli S; Schettino F; Chatenoud L; Crosignani PG
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 86(5):754-7. PubMed ID: 7566843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical screening: management of patients referred for colposcopy with smear abnormalities less severe than dyskaryosis.
Usman F; Hammond R
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 9577736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of cell block preparation for morphological, immunocytochemistry, and ploidy analysis in ThinPrep monolayer preparations.
Freitas C; Milanezi F; Dias AJ; Bento MJ; Schmitt FC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Dec; 25(6):415-7. PubMed ID: 11747241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of acetic acid smear test for cervical cancer screening].
Wu LY; Li N; Zhang WH; Li L; Pan QJ; Qiao YL; Rong SD; Zhao FH; Pretorius RG; Belinson JL
Ai Zheng; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1096-8. PubMed ID: 14558960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy.
Bergeron C; Bishop J; Lemarie A; Cas F; Ayivi J; Huynh B; Barrasso R
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11480712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
