These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7796528)

  • 1. Clinical experience with the SimulVue soft bifocal contact lens.
    Bierly JR; Furgason TG; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1995 Apr; 21(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 7796528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the anterior constant focus (ACF) annular bifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Lim ES; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1993 Oct; 19(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 8261605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast sensitivity measurements with the Echelon diffractive bifocal contact lens as compared to bifocal spectacles.
    Sanislo S; Wicker D; Green DG
    CLAO J; 1992 Jul; 18(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 1499121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].
    Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the NOVAWET-Perception bifocal contact lens.
    Anderson CW; Bierly JR; Litteral G; Gross J; Hainsworth D
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8728616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contact lens correction of presbyopia.
    Bennett ES
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 May; 91(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 18201225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections.
    Back A; Grant T; Hine N
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 69(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 1641231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
    Durrie DS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2006; 104():366-401. PubMed ID: 17471352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia.
    Collins MJ; Brown B; Verney SJ; Makras M; Bowman KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 2771322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of vision with presbyopic contact lens correction: subjective and light sensitivity rating.
    Alongi S; Rolando M; Corallo G; Siniscalchi C; Monaco M; Saccà S; Verrastro G; Menoni S; Ravera GB; Calabria G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 239(9):656-63. PubMed ID: 11688664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual function through 4 contact lens-based pinhole systems for presbyopia.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Cerviño A; Charman WN; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 22424803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Sha J; Bakaraju RC; Tilia D; Chung J; Delaney S; Munro A; Ehrmann K; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016 Apr; 79(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 27224066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-Term Visual Performance of Novel Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Bakaraju RC; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Munro A; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Apr; 93(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 26808384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.