These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7797731)

  • 1. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA; Burgess JO; Batzer RC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond.
    Imbery TA; Hilton TJ; Reagan SE
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond.
    Fischer GM; Stewart GP; Panelli J
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of extensive amalgam restorations retained by pins, amalgapins and amalgam bonding agents.
    Imbery TA; Coudron J; Moon PC
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 19051860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of adhesive volume on the bond strength of bonded complex amalgam restorations.
    Overton JD; Vance RI
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):320-2. PubMed ID: 16433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of condensation techniques on amalgam bond strengths to dentin.
    Ratananakin T; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):191-5. PubMed ID: 9484171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro shear strength of bonded amalgam cores with and without pins.
    Lo CS; Millstein PL; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 74(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 8531157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG; Moore BK; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shear bond strength of amalgam reinforced with a bonding agent and/or dentin pins.
    Sen D; Nayir E; Cetiner F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Apr; 87(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 12011862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adhesive liner incorporation in dental amalgam restorations.
    Boston DW
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jan; 28(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10332355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations: what is the evidence?
    Vaught RL
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 17923714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long term sealing properties of Amalgambond under amalgam restorations.
    Ben-Amar A; Liberman R; Rothkoff Z; Cardash HS
    Am J Dent; 1994 Jun; 7(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 7993602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.