BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7799495)

  • 21. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening mammography and public health policy: the need for perspective.
    Wright CJ; Mueller CB
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8966):29-32. PubMed ID: 7603143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.
    White E; Urban N; Taylor V
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():605-33. PubMed ID: 8323604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early detection of breast cancer in women.
    Humphrey LL; Ballard DJ
    Prim Care; 1989 Mar; 16(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 2495540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The cost-effectiveness of nationwide breast carcinoma screening in Finland, 1987-1992.
    Leivo T; Sintonen H; Tuominen R; Hakama M; Pukkala E; Heinonen OP
    Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):638-46. PubMed ID: 10440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A quest for quality and economic effectiveness throughout the continuum of breast care.
    La Fargue MM; Coleman C
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):251-2. PubMed ID: 20392641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    US Preventive Services Task Force
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Expansion of screening mammography in the Veterans Health Administration: implications for breast cancer treatment.
    Kvasnovsky CL; Kesmodel SB; Gragasin JL; Punnoose V; Johnson PA; Goel R; Reddy SK; Pierson RN; Jain A
    JAMA Surg; 2013 Nov; 148(11):999-1004. PubMed ID: 24048217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.
    Greif JM
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Economic considerations in breast cancer screening of older women.
    Brown ML
    J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():51-8. PubMed ID: 1430883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Autier P; Grivegnée AR
    Rev Med Brux; 1995; 16(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 7481252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
    Iinuma T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Mandelblatt J; Saha S; Teutsch S; Hoerger T; Siu AL; Atkins D; Klein J; Helfand M;
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 139(10):835-42. PubMed ID: 14623621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
    Feig S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Screening younger women at risk for breast cancer.
    Vogel VG
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1994; (16):55-60. PubMed ID: 7999470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a protocol for evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer.
    Mackay J; Rogers C; Fielder H; Blamey R; Macmillan D; Boggis C; Brown J; Pharoah PD; Moss S; Day NE; Myles J; Austoker J; Gray J; Cuzick J; Duffy SW
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2001; 6(5):365-9; discussion 371-5. PubMed ID: 11822726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia.
    Hall J; Gerard K; Salkeld G; Richardson J
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 May; 34(9):993-1004. PubMed ID: 1631612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Costs of treatment for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer in fee-for-service settings.
    Warren JL; Brown ML; Fay MP; Schussler N; Potosky AL; Riley GF
    J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jan; 20(1):307-16. PubMed ID: 11773184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.