These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7799693)

  • 1. PACER: a software tool for PACS decision makers.
    Enning CJ; van Gennip EM; van den Broeck R; Rechid R; Wein B; Bakker AR
    Med Inform (Lond); 1994; 19(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 7799693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for cost-effective implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems. An approach building on practical experiences in three European hospitals.
    van Gennip EM; Enning J; Fischer F; Glaser KH; Kilbinger M; Klose KJ; List-Hellwig E; Van der Loo R; Rechid R; Van den Broeck R; Wein B
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1996 Dec; 43(3):161-78. PubMed ID: 9032006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Economic and organizational evaluation of an imaging network (PACS)].
    Charvet-Protat S; Thoral F
    J Radiol; 1998 Dec; 79(12):1453-9. PubMed ID: 9921447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do the benefits outweigh the costs of PACS? The results of an International Workshop on Technology Assessment of PACS.
    van Gennip EM; Bakker AR; Greberman M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1992 May; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 1356707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once.
    Fang YC; Yang MC; Hsueh YS
    J Digit Imaging; 2006; 19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):44-51. PubMed ID: 16763930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A package for cost and critical analysis of picture archiving and communication indicating its true yield (CAPACITY).
    van Poppel BM; Bakker AR; Wilmink JB
    Med Inform (Lond); 1990; 15(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 2374468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overview of CAPACITY data.
    van Gennip EM; Heiska K; Kemerink GJ; Ratib O; Rechid R; van den Broeck R; van Erning LJ; van Poppel BM; Verra WJ; Warburton R
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1992 May; 30(3-4):173-80. PubMed ID: 1634260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PACS experiences in Trieste.
    Giribona P; Bravar D; Stacul F; Ukovich W
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1992 May; 30(3-4):285-93. PubMed ID: 1634278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of the costs of a hospital-wide Picture Archiving and Communication System with the software package CAPACITY.
    van Gennip EM; van Poppel BM; Bakker AR; Ottes FP; Kouwenberg JM; Wilmink JB
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 12(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 1999217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PACS costs: modelling and simulation.
    Bakker AR; Stut WJ; De Valk JP; Reijns GR
    Med Inform (Lond); 1988; 13(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 3246905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of coordinated action in PACS evaluation.
    Racoveanu NT
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1992 May; 30(3-4):295-300. PubMed ID: 1634279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS.
    Hilsenrath PE; Smith WL; Berbaum KS; Franken EA; Owen DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jan; 156(1):177-80. PubMed ID: 1898556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in the evaluation of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Bryan S; Keen J; Muris N; Weatherburn G; Buxton M
    Health Policy; 1995 Jul; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 10143699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Financing a large-scale picture archival and communication system.
    Goldszal AF; Bleshman MH; Bryan RN
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Jan; 11(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 14746408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future.
    Arenson RL; Andriole KP; Avrin DE; Gould RG
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Nov; 13(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 11110253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Establishing benchmarks for creation of a pro-forma economic model to evaluate filmless PACS operation.
    Reiner B; Siegel E; Bradham D; Saunders H; Johnson B
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Aug; 13(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 15359752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Costs and benefits of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Becker SH; Arenson RL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1994; 1(5):361-71. PubMed ID: 7850560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cost analysis of film image management and four PACS based on different network protocols.
    Beard D; Parrish D; Stevenson D
    J Digit Imaging; 1990 May; 3(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 2092809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technology assessment methods for radiology systems.
    Langlotz CP; Seshadri S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1996 May; 34(3):667-79. PubMed ID: 8657877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of PACS based on 2 years experiences of Hokkaido University PACS.
    Irie G; Miyasaka K
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1992 May; 30(3-4):281-4. PubMed ID: 1634277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.