These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7800000)

  • 1. CMAP variability as a function of electrode site and size.
    van Dijk JG; Tjon-a-Tsien A; van der Kamp W
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Jan; 18(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 7800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of recording site on CMAP amplitude on its variation over a length of nerve.
    van Dijk JG; van der Kamp W; van Hilten BJ; van Someren P
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1286-92. PubMed ID: 7935551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials.
    Wee AS; Ashley RA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of reference electrode to the compound muscle action potential.
    Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Jul; 36(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 17455266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential.
    Barkhaus PE; Periquet MI; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for measuring compound muscle action potentials in facial palsy: a preliminary study.
    Haginomori S; Wada S; Takamaki A; Nonaka R; Takenaka H; Takubo T
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Jun; 37(6):764-9. PubMed ID: 18506721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of size and pressure of surface recording electrodes on amplitude of sensory nerve action potentials.
    Ven AA; Van Hees JG; Stappaerts KH
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 Aug; 30(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 15266641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The effect of surface area of active recording electrode to CMAP parameters].
    Chang H; Chan RC; Hsu TC
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Jun; 51(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 8281488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential change in different ways over the length of the ulnar nerve.
    Johnsen B; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A; de Carvalho M; Labarre-Vila A; Nix W; Schofield I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 117(9):2085-92. PubMed ID: 16876477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 7935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal placement of recording electrodes for quantifying facial nerve compound muscle action potential.
    Guo L; Jasiukaitis P; Pitts LH; Cheung SW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):710-3. PubMed ID: 18434927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration.
    Kincaid JC; Brashear A; Markand ON
    Muscle Nerve; 1993 Apr; 16(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 8455652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of the best electrode position for recording of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential.
    Dionne A; Parkes A; Engler B; Watson BV; Nicolle MW
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Jul; 40(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19533636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of reference electrode position on the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) onset latency.
    Phongsamart G; Wertsch JJ; Ferdjallah M; King JC; Foster DT
    Muscle Nerve; 2002 Jun; 25(6):816-21. PubMed ID: 12115969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
    Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accessory nerve stimulation: motor response of the sternocleidomastoid muscle.
    Pinto S; de Carvalho M
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2008 Apr; 38(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18423334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Interrelationship among nerve conduction velocity, amplitudes of compound muscle and compound nerve action potentials in diabetic neuropathy].
    Hasegawa O; Matsumoto S; Iino M; Mori I; Arita T; Baba Y
    No To Shinkei; 1999 Oct; 51(10):863-6. PubMed ID: 10553586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different types of surface electrodes on amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential.
    Jonas D; Bischoff C; Conrad B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2171-5. PubMed ID: 10616123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study on the latency difference between compound muscle and sensory nerve action potentials].
    Hasegawa O; Gondo G; Wada N; Matsumoto S; Mimura E
    No To Shinkei; 2001 Jun; 53(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 11436338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.