76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7800708)
21. Suboptimal sequence alignment in molecular biology. Alignment with error analysis.
Zuker M
J Mol Biol; 1991 Sep; 221(2):403-20. PubMed ID: 1920426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sequence alignment and penalty choice. Review of concepts, case studies and implications.
Vingron M; Waterman MS
J Mol Biol; 1994 Jan; 235(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8289235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Approximate statistics of gapped alignments.
Mott R; Tribe R
J Comput Biol; 1999; 6(1):91-112. PubMed ID: 10223667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Score distributions of gapped multiple sequence alignments down to the low-probability tail.
Fieth P; Hartmann AK
Phys Rev E; 2016 Aug; 94(2-1):022127. PubMed ID: 27627266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Local alignment statistics.
Altschul SF; Gish W
Methods Enzymol; 1996; 266():460-80. PubMed ID: 8743700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. On the distribution of k-tuple matches for sequence homology: a constant time exact calculation of the variance.
Benson G; Su X
J Comput Biol; 1998; 5(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 9541873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Parametric and inverse-parametric sequence alignment with XPARAL.
Gusfield D; Stelling P
Methods Enzymol; 1996; 266():481-94. PubMed ID: 8743701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Statistical methods and insights for protein and DNA sequences.
Karlin S; Bucher P; Brendel V; Altschul SF
Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem; 1991; 20():175-203. PubMed ID: 1867715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Poisson, compound Poisson and process approximations for testing statistical significance in sequence comparisons.
Goldstein L; Waterman MS
Bull Math Biol; 1992 Sep; 54(5):785-812. PubMed ID: 1638260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An accurate approximation to the distribution of the length of the longest matching word between two random DNA sequences.
Mott RF; Kirkwood TB; Curnow RN
Bull Math Biol; 1990; 52(6):773-84. PubMed ID: 2279194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neweyes: a system for comparing biological sequences using the running Karp-Rabin Greedy String-Tiling algorithm.
Wise MJ
Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1995; 3():393-401. PubMed ID: 7584464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A statistical theory of sequence alignment with gaps.
Drasdo D; Hwa T; Lässig M
Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1998; 6():52-8. PubMed ID: 9783209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Amino acid substitution matrices from an information theoretic perspective.
Altschul SF
J Mol Biol; 1991 Jun; 219(3):555-65. PubMed ID: 2051488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Parametric and ensemble sequence alignment algorithms.
Waterman MS
Bull Math Biol; 1994 Jul; 56(4):743-67. PubMed ID: 8054893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Approximations to profile score distributions.
Goldstein L; Waterman MS
J Comput Biol; 1994; 1(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 8790456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The probabilities of similarities in DNA sequence comparisons.
Brooks LD; Weir BS; Schaffer HE
Genomics; 1988 Oct; 3(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 3224980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Crystallographic Data and Model Quality.
Diederichs K
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1320():147-73. PubMed ID: 26227042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An efficient string matching algorithm with K substitutions for nucleotide and amino acid sequences.
Landau GM; Vishkin U; Nussinov R
J Theor Biol; 1987 Jun; 126(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 3657242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combining evidence using p-values: application to sequence homology searches.
Bailey TL; Gribskov M
Bioinformatics; 1998; 14(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 9520501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital signal processing methods for biosequence comparison.
Benson DC
Nucleic Acids Res; 1990 May; 18(10):3001-6. PubMed ID: 2349096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
