BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7801060)

  • 1. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM).
    Hamilton BB; Laughlin JA; Fiedler RC; Granger CV
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1994 Sep; 26(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 7801060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.
    Kohler F; Dickson H; Redmond H; Estell J; Connolly C
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Dec; 45(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 20032905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the FONE FIM: Part I. Construct validity.
    Chang WC; Slaughter S; Cartwright D; Chan C
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(3):192-218. PubMed ID: 9661721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interrater reliability of functional status scores for patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.
    Kohler F; Redmond H; Dickson H; Connolly C; Estell J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 91(7):1031-7. PubMed ID: 20599041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the modified functional independence measure be reliably obtained from the patient medical record by different raters?
    Gabbe BJ; Sutherland AM; Wolfe R; Williamson OD; Cameron PA
    J Trauma; 2007 Dec; 63(6):1374-9. PubMed ID: 18212664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.
    Hall KM; Bushnik T; Lakisic-Kazazic B; Wright J; Cantagallo A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 82(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 11245760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between duration of therapy services in a comprehensive rehabilitation program and mobility at discharge in patients with orthopedic problems.
    Kirk-Sanchez NJ; Roach KE
    Phys Ther; 2001 Mar; 81(3):888-95. PubMed ID: 11268153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities.
    Noreau L; Desrosiers J; Robichaud L; Fougeyrollas P; Rochette A; Viscogliosi C
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 26(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 15204486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.
    Seel RT; Wright G; Wallace T; Newman S; Dennis L
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2007; 22(5):267-77. PubMed ID: 17878768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of the FIM instrument in the inpatient burn rehabilitation population.
    Gerrard P; Goldstein R; Divita MA; Ryan CM; Mix J; Niewczyk P; Kazis L; Kowalske K; Zafonte R; Schneider JC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1521-1526.e4. PubMed ID: 23473701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional independence among young adults with spina bifida, in relation to hydrocephalus and level of lesion.
    Verhoef M; Barf HA; Post MW; van Asbeck FW; Gooskens RH; Prevo AJ
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2006 Feb; 48(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16417666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [References for evaluation scales in quality assurance in rehabilitation--1. II. Measuring functional independence in rehabilitation with the Functional Independence Index].
    de Langen EG; Frommelt P; Wiedmann KD; Amann J
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1995 Feb; 34(1):IV-XI. PubMed ID: 7716333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of proxies in community integration research.
    Cusick CP; Brooks CA; Whiteneck GG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Aug; 82(8):1018-24. PubMed ID: 11494179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Clinical Rehabilitation (USER).
    Post MW; van de Port IG; Kap B; Berdenis van Berlekom SH
    Clin Rehabil; 2009 Oct; 23(10):909-17. PubMed ID: 19717505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Hsu Y; Granger CV; Fiedler RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Dec; 77(12):1226-32. PubMed ID: 8976303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis.
    Månsson E; Lexell J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 May; 26(10):576-85. PubMed ID: 15204511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study.
    Kidd D; Stewart G; Baldry J; Johnson J; Rossiter D; Petruckevitch A; Thompson AJ
    Disabil Rehabil; 1995 Jan; 17(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 7858276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interrater reliability of the Functional Assessment Measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program.
    Donaghy S; Wass PJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Oct; 79(10):1231-6. PubMed ID: 9779676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM).
    Dickson HG; Köhler F
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1995 Dec; 27(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 8650510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.