These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7802070)

  • 1. Burch colposuspension versus modified Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy for primary genuine stress urinary incontinence: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Colombo M; Scalambrino S; Maggioni A; Milani R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 171(6):1573-9. PubMed ID: 7802070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy and Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women with low pressure and hypermobility of the urethra: early results of a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Quadri G; Magatti F; Belloni C; Barisani D; Natale N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 181(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 10411835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative results of different types of urethropexy in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women].
    Salinas Casado J; Virseda Chamorro M; Ramírez Fernández JC; Rapariz González M; Esteban Fuertes M; Resel Estévez L
    Arch Esp Urol; 1994 Oct; 47(8):761-8. PubMed ID: 7818295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five years follow up of laparoscopic burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in Thai women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Wisawasukmongchol W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88(9):1182-6. PubMed ID: 16536102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified Burch versus Pereyra retropubic urethropexy for stress urinary incontinence.
    Bhatia NN; Bergman A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Aug; 66(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 4040618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genuine stress incontinence: prospective randomized comparison of two operative methods.
    Liapis A; Pyrgiotis E; Kontoravdis A; Louridas C; Zourlas PA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Jan; 64(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 8801153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effects of urethropexy on urination. A price to pay?].
    Salinas Casado J; Virseda Chamorro M; Ramírez Fernández JC; Rapariz González M; Esteban Fuertes M; Samblas García R; Resel Estévez L
    Arch Esp Urol; 1995 Sep; 48(7):709-16. PubMed ID: 7487177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A surgical technique to adjust bladder neck suspension in laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
    Yang JM; Yang SH; Huang WC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 16825068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open Burch urethropexy has a low rate of perioperative complications.
    Kenton K; Oldham L; Brubaker L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jul; 187(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 12114897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
    Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial.
    Paraiso MF; Walters MD; Karram MM; Barber MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 104(6):1249-58. PubMed ID: 15572485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody DJ; Grant AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD002912. PubMed ID: 12535443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomized study comparing modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra.
    Sand PK; Winkler H; Blackhurst DW; Culligan PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 182(1 Pt 1):30-4. PubMed ID: 10649153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized trial of burch retropubic urethropexy and anterior colporrhaphy for stress urinary incontinence.
    Kammerer-Doak DN; Dorin MH; Rogers RG; Cousin MO
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 93(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 9916960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted Burch for pure stress urinary incontinence: a large case series.
    Lee TG; Unlu BS; Petruzzi VA; Borahay MA; Dursun F; Saad AF; Kilic GS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jul; 41(5):803-806. PubMed ID: 33063572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impact of bladder irritative symptoms and detrusor instability on the outcome of urethropexy].
    Virseda Chamorro M; Salinas Casado J; Ramírez Fernández JC; Rapariz González M; Esteban Fuertes M; Nacarino Corbacho L; Resel Estévez L
    Arch Esp Urol; 1995; 48(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 7661637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized comparison of Burch colposuspension and abdominal paravaginal defect repair for female stress urinary incontinence.
    Colombo M; Milani R; Vitobello D; Maggioni A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 8694079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A urodynamic appraisal of success and failure after retropubic urethropexy.
    Francis LN; Sand PK; Hamrang K; Ostergard DR
    J Reprod Med; 1987 Sep; 32(9):693-6. PubMed ID: 3668968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voiding function after Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence.
    Wall LL; Hewitt JK
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Mar; 41(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 8778413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.