These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7802912)

  • 1. Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns.
    Leong D; Chai J; Lautenschlager E; Gilbert J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 7802912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the fit of spark-eroded titanium copings and cast gold alloy copings.
    Harris IR; Wickens JL
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 7993546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of marginal fit of 3 different metal-ceramic systems: an in vitro study.
    Pettenò D; Schierano G; Bassi F; Bresciano ME; Carossa S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11203662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-1.6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature.
    Tao J; Yoda M; Kimura K; Okuno O
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 16038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Fixed tooth replacement of milled/spark eroded titanium].
    Reppel PD; Böning K; Walter M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Nov; 46(11):756-8. PubMed ID: 1817880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensional changes of one-piece frameworks cast from titanium, base metal, or noble metal alloys and supported on telescopic crowns.
    Gebelein M; Richter G; Range U; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12616241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium single crowns.
    Leong DK; Chai JY; Gilbert JL
    Northwest Dent Res; 1994; 4(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 9487937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns.
    Jesús Suárez M; Lozano JF; Paz Salido M; Martínez F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):390-1. PubMed ID: 16220803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of electric arc, gas oxygen torch and induction melting techniques on the marginal accuracy of cast base-metal and noble metal-ceramic crowns.
    Gómez-Cogolludo P; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 23810734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns.
    Valderrama S; Van Roekel N; Andersson M; Goodacre CJ; Munoz CA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 7710622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mechanical properties of milled and cast titanium for ceramic veneering.
    King AW; Chai J; Lautenschlager E; Gilbert J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 7748447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fit of cast commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy crowns before and after marginal refinement by electrical discharge machining.
    Contreras EF; Henriques GE; Giolo SR; Nobilo MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12473994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns.
    Han HS; Yang HS; Lim HP; Park YJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 21889006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal and internal adaptation of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy cast restorations.
    Al Wazzan KA; Al-Nazzawi AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 17211501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
    Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of recasting palladium-silver alloy on the fit of crowns with different marginal configurations.
    Lopes MB; Consani S; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 16275302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of metal selection and porcelain firing on the marginal accuracy of titanium-based metal ceramic restorations.
    Shokry TE; Attia M; Mosleh I; Elhosary M; Hamza T; Shen C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 20105684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hardness, strength, and ductility of prefabricated titanium rods used in the manufacture of spark erosion crowns.
    Berg E; Davik G; Hegdahl T; Gjerdet NR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 75(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 8642529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.