These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7803007)
61. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins. Peris AR; Duarte S; de Andrade MF Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12666857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Jain P; Stewart GP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11203791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Influence of tooth cryopreservation and storage time on microleakage. Camps J; Baudry X; Bordes V; Dejou J; Pignoly C; Ladeque P Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 9002854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Prepolymerization of Gluma 4 sealer: effect on bonding. Crim GA Am J Dent; 1990 Feb; 3(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 2115787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Short-term assessment of leakage of Class V composite restorations placed in vivo. Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 9552819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Effect of substrate age on microleakage of dentine adhesive agents. Crim GA J Oral Rehabil; 1989 Nov; 16(6):555-7. PubMed ID: 2513381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Longitudinal evaluation of the microleakage of dentin bonding agents used to seal resected root apices. Vignaroli PA; Anderson RW; Pashley DH J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):509-12. PubMed ID: 8596072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Effects of uncontrolled outdoor storage on the polymerization, manipulation, and appearance of visible light-cured composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer materials. Fallo GJ; Wakefield CW; Czerw RJ Mil Med; 1996 May; 161(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 8855062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Microleakage of Posterior Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts Using two Adhesives after ging. Sharafeddin F; Yousefi H; Modiri Sh; Tondari A; Safaee Jahromi S J Dent (Shiraz); 2013 Sep; 14(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 24724129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Marginal sealing durability of two contemporary self-etch adhesives. Khoroushi M; Mansoori M ISRN Dent; 2012; 2012():204813. PubMed ID: 22611501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. To compare the microleakage among experimental adhesives containing nanoclay fillers after the storages of 24 hours and 6 months. Mousavinasab SM; Atai M; Alavi B Open Dent J; 2011 Mar; 5():52-7. PubMed ID: 21566692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Effect of aging on microleakage of restorative systems. Crim GA Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 7803007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials. Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. Payne JH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]