These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7803197)

  • 1. Model misspecification detection by means of multiple generator errors, using the observed potential map.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 7(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 7803197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple-generator errors are unavoidable under model misspecification.
    Jewett DL; Zhang Z
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Aug; 95(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 7649005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL; Goodwill G
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 6(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 7946928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7681385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DSL and MUSIC under model misspecification and noise-conditions.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 7(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 7696092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equivalent dipole source localization of EEG and evoked potentials: sources of errors or sources with confidence?
    van Dijk BW; Spekreijse H; Yamazaki T
    Brain Topogr; 1993; 5(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 8357707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dipole modeling of epileptic spikes can be accurate or misleading.
    Kobayashi K; Yoshinaga H; Ohtsuka Y; Gotman J
    Epilepsia; 2005 Mar; 46(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 15730537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ICA based multiple brain sources localization.
    Chen Y; Akutagawa M; Katayama M; Zhang Q; Kinouchi Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1879-82. PubMed ID: 19163055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data.
    Mosher JC; Lewis PS; Leahy RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jun; 39(6):541-57. PubMed ID: 1601435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approximating dipoles from human EEG activity: the effect of dipole source configuration on dipolarity using single dipole models.
    Hara J; Musha T; Shankle WR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Feb; 46(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 9932333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Thévenet M; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 102(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 9191589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency domain dipole localization: extensions of the method and applications to auditory and visual evoked potentials.
    Raz J; Biggins CA; Turetsky B; Fein G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Sep; 40(9):909-18. PubMed ID: 8288282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Location of electric current sources in the human brain estimated by the dipole tracing method of the scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model.
    Homma S; Musha T; Nakajima Y; Okamoto Y; Blom S; Flink R; Hagbarth KE; Moström U
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 91(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 7525234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The localization of equivalent dipoles of EEG sources by the application of electrical field theory.
    Henderson CJ; Butler SR; Glass A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Aug; 39(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 50209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of model parameters on the inverse solution based on MEGs and EEGs.
    Peters MJ; De Munck JC
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():61-8; discussion 69. PubMed ID: 1814156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uniqueness of the generators of brain evoked potential maps.
    Amir A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jan; 41(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8200662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved dipole localization using local mesh refinement of realistic head geometries: an EEG simulation study.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 99(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 8758973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.