These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7804351)

  • 1. Fundamentally flawed?
    Oldham RK
    Cancer Biother; 1993; 8(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 7804351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fundamentally flawed?
    Oldham RK
    Mol Biother; 1988; 1(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 3269250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remembering the peer in peer review.
    O'Connell KA
    Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Peer review].
    Boer EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Dec; 133(49):2455-9. PubMed ID: 2594115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems with peer review and alternatives.
    Smith R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Mar; 296(6624):774-7. PubMed ID: 3126969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bicameral grant review: an alternative to conventional peer review.
    Forsdyke DR
    FASEB J; 1991 Jun; 5(9):2313-4. PubMed ID: 1860622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Peer review when applying for a subsidy].
    Klasen EC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Jun; 141(23):1161-2. PubMed ID: 9380149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter: Peer review.
    Westhead EW
    Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1679. PubMed ID: 4827513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: the attacks from without.
    Brandt EN
    Clin Res; 1986 Oct; 34(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 3780137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The "peer review" system needs to be changed.
    Hill GJ
    J Cancer Educ; 1989; 4(3):191-2. PubMed ID: 2641339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What does peer review need?
    Pollock DM
    Physiologist; 2015 Jan; 58(1):1, 13. PubMed ID: 25745684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review and scientific method in clinical research.
    Morgan PP
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 124(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 7459784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review in the allocation of university research funds.
    Chubb IW; Chalmers JP
    Aust Clin Rev; 1985 Jun; (17):86-9. PubMed ID: 4074203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: relevance for research in clinical neuropsychology.
    Cicchetti DV; Rourke BP; Wass P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1992 Nov; 14(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 1452641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proposals, peer review, and research results.
    Roy R
    Science; 1979 Jun; 204(4398):1154, 1156-7. PubMed ID: 451561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research funding and the peer review system.
    Apirion D
    Fed Proc; 1979 Dec; 38(13):2649-50. PubMed ID: 510555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review and the support of science.
    Cole S; Rubin L; Cole JR
    Sci Am; 1977 Oct; 237(4):34-41. PubMed ID: 905818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: quality control of applied social research.
    Noble JH
    Science; 1974 Sep; 185(4155):916-21. PubMed ID: 4469669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The crisis of the peer review system.
    Lepow IH
    Fed Proc; 1973 Aug; 32(8):1827. PubMed ID: 4718901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The peer review system on trial.
    Bowers R
    Am Sci; 1975; 63(6):624-6. PubMed ID: 1200477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.