These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
716 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7804650)
1. Pesticide registration in the United States: overview and new directions. Culleen LE Qual Assur; 1994 Sep; 3(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 7804650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA. Fenner-Crisp PA Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):199-200. PubMed ID: 8672877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulatory oversight of biochemical pesticides by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: health effects considerations. McClintock JT; Kough JL; Sjoblad RD Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 19(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 8159811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FIFRA-88, GLP, and QA: pesticide registration. Sterner RT; Fagerstone KA Qual Assur; 1997; 5(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 9509549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When it won't sell stateside. Bright C Environ Aciton; 1990; 21(5):18-9, 23. PubMed ID: 12286557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. EPA challenges and review--highlights of the Fiscal Year 1994 Inspection Program and EPA's laboratory accreditation considerations. Dull D Qual Assur; 1995 Mar; 4(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 8520861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status. Box RJ; Spielmann H Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Food Quality Protection Act: its impact on the pesticide industry. Wagner JM Qual Assur; 1997; 5(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9670242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aggregate exposures under the Food Quality Protection Act: An approach using chlorpyrifos. Shurdut BA; Barraj L; Francis M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 9927565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Worker exposure studies. Dow MI Qual Assur; 1994 Sep; 3(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 7804648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pesticide regulations: exposure-dose modeling from FIFRA to FQPA. Knaak JB; Tan C; Dary CC Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2012; 112():117-62. PubMed ID: 22974739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. EPA regulation of plant-incorporated protectants: assessment of impacts of gene flow from pest-resistant plants. Wozniak CA; Martinez JC J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Jun; 59(11):5859-64. PubMed ID: 21080671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tolerance setting process in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Trichilo CL; Schmitt RD J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1989; 72(3):536-8. PubMed ID: 2745386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environment. Endosulfan's exit: U.S. EPA pesticide review leads to a ban. Lubick N Science; 2010 Jun; 328(5985):1466. PubMed ID: 20558680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Special pesticide formulations. Veterinarians must follow EPA rules. J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2004 Aug; 225(4):490-1. PubMed ID: 15344349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dietary risk assessment for pesticide residues in food of plant origin during the plant protection product's registration process]. Struciński P; Góralczyk K; Czaja K; Hernik A; Korcz W; Ludwicki JK Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 17713193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]