247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7805219)
1. Comparison of cost-effectiveness and utility of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and coronary angiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Patterson RE; Eisner RL; Horowitz SF
Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 7805219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with chest pain.
Kuntz KM; Fleischmann KE; Hunink MG; Douglas PS
Ann Intern Med; 1999 May; 130(9):709-18. PubMed ID: 10357689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Garber AM; Solomon NA
Ann Intern Med; 1999 May; 130(9):719-28. PubMed ID: 10357690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effective selection of patients for coronary angiography.
Maddahi J; Gambhir SS
J Nucl Cardiol; 1997; 4(2 Pt 2):S141-51. PubMed ID: 9115076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with chest pain: Comparison with myocardial single photon emission tomography.
Lee SP; Jang EJ; Kim YJ; Cha MJ; Park SY; Song HJ; Choi JE; Shim JI; Ahn J; Lee HJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 25977116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the most common diagnostic methods for coronary artery disease].
Dewey M; Hamm B
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jun; 129(25-26):1415-9. PubMed ID: 15213872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian comparison of cost-effectiveness of different clinical approaches to diagnose coronary artery disease.
Patterson RE; Eng C; Horowitz SF; Gorlin R; Goldstein SR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Aug; 4(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 6429224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Germany.
Boldt J; Leber AW; Bonaventura K; Sohns C; Stula M; Huppertz A; Haverkamp W; Dorenkamp M
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Apr; 15(1):30. PubMed ID: 23574690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial SPECT and stress echocardiography in suspected coronary artery disease considering the prognostic value of false-negative results.
Lee DS; Jang MJ; Cheon GJ; Chung JK; Lee MC
J Nucl Cardiol; 2002; 9(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 12360132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of functional cardiac testing in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial. The CECaT trial.
Sharples L; Hughes V; Crean A; Dyer M; Buxton M; Goldsmith K; Stone D
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(49):iii-iv, ix-115. PubMed ID: 18021576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction: a probabilistic economic analysis.
Hernández R; Vale L
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(6):772-88. PubMed ID: 17989429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction.
Mowatt G; Vale L; Brazzelli M; Hernandez R; Murray A; Scott N; Fraser C; McKenzie L; Gemmell H; Hillis G; Metcalfe M
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jul; 8(30):iii-iv, 1-207. PubMed ID: 15248938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost analysis of diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease in women with stable chest pain. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Study Group.
Shaw LJ; Heller GV; Travin MI; Lauer M; Marwick T; Hachamovitch R; Berman DS; Miller DD
J Nucl Cardiol; 1999; 6(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 10608582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain.
Ladapo JA; Jaffer FA; Hoffmann U; Thomson CC; Bamberg F; Dec W; Cutler DM; Weinstein MC; Gazelle GS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(25):2409-22. PubMed ID: 20082932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease.
Min JK; Gilmore A; Budoff MJ; Berman DS; O'Day K
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):801-8. PubMed ID: 20177094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct costs and cost-effectiveness of dual-source computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease.
Dorenkamp M; Bonaventura K; Sohns C; Becker CR; Leber AW
Heart; 2012 Mar; 98(6):460-7. PubMed ID: 21846767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A microcosting study of diagnostic tests for the detection of coronary artery disease in The Netherlands.
Tan SS; Oppe M; Zoet-Nugteren SK; Niezen RA; Kofflard MJ; Ten Cate FJ; Hakkaart-van Roijen L
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18703301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Tests for Assessing Stable Chest Pain: Modeled Analysis of Anatomical and Functional Strategies.
Bertoldi EG; Stella SF; Rohde LE; Polanczyk CA
Clin Cardiol; 2016 May; 39(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 27080921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost.
Lee SP; Seo JK; Hwang IC; Park JB; Park EA; Lee W; Paeng JC; Lee HJ; Yoon YE; Kim HL; Koh E; Choi I; Choi JE; Kim YJ
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 20(4):417-425. PubMed ID: 30052964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes.
Priest VL; Scuffham PA; Hachamovitch R; Marwick TH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 May; 4(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 21565744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]