These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7805249)
1. Improved defibrillation threshold with a new epicardial carbon electrode compared with a standard epicardial titanium patch. Alt EU; Fotuhi PC; Callihan RL; Rollins DL; Mestre E; Combs MP; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 7805249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations. Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endocardial carbon-braid electrodes. A new concept for lower defibrillation thresholds. Alt EU; Fotuhi PC; Callihan RL; Mestre E; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(6):1627-33. PubMed ID: 7664450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of defibrillation probability of success curves for an endocardial lead configuration with and without an inactive epicardial patch. Callihan RL; Idriss SF; Dahl RW; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 May; 25(6):1373-9. PubMed ID: 7722136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans. Bardy GH; Troutman C; Johnson G; Mehra R; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Gartman DM Circulation; 1991 Aug; 84(2):665-71. PubMed ID: 1860210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of electrode design, lead configuration and impedance for successful low energy transcatheter atrial defibrillation in dogs. Kalman JM; Power JM; Chen JM; Farish SJ; Tonkin AM J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 22(4):1199-206. PubMed ID: 8409061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway. Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system. Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems. Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location. Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lidocaine's effect on defibrillation threshold are dependent on the defibrillation electrode system: epicardial versus endocardial. Winecoff Miller AP; Sims JJ; McSwain R; Ujhelyi MR J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 9(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 9554736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superiority of biphasic shocks in the defibrillation of dogs by epicardial patches and catheter electrodes. Flaker GC; Schuder JC; McDaniel WC; Stoeckle H; Dbeis M Am Heart J; 1989 Aug; 118(2):288-91. PubMed ID: 2750650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system. Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks using a braided endocardial defibrillation lead system. Saksena S; Scott SE; Accorti PR; Boveja BK; Abels D; Callaghan FJ Am Heart J; 1990 Dec; 120(6 Pt 1):1342-7. PubMed ID: 2248181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Position of epicardial patch electrodes for implantable defibrillation significantly affects shock strength requirements. KenKnight BH; Heil JE; Hahn SJ; Lang DJ Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 2(1):50-5, discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 7606614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defibrillation thresholds and perioperative mortality associated with endocardial and epicardial defibrillation lead systems. The PCD investigators and participating institutions. Saksena S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jan; 16(1 Pt 2):202-7. PubMed ID: 7681572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]