These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 78060)

  • 1. Has continuous intrapartum monitoring made any impact on fetal outcome?
    Johnstone FD; Campbell DM; Hughes GJ
    Lancet; 1978 Jun; 1(8077):1298-300. PubMed ID: 78060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
    Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Fetal asphyxia at delivery].
    Timonen S; Erkkola R
    Duodecim; 2004; 120(20):2415-22. PubMed ID: 15641510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of availability of fetal ECG monitoring on operative deliveries.
    Kale A; Chong YS; Biswas A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1189-93. PubMed ID: 19016356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices.
    Mueller-Heubach E; MacDonald HM; Joret D; Portman MA; Edelstone DI; Caritis SN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 7405966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tucker JM; Hauth JC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 33(3):515-25. PubMed ID: 2225584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adverse outcome of pregnancy and the quality of obstetric care.
    Niswander K; Henson G; Elbourne D; Chalmers I; Redman C; Macfarlane A; Tizard P
    Lancet; 1984 Oct; 2(8407):827-31. PubMed ID: 6148570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Lee WK; Baggish MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 47(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 1264397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system].
    Guo X; Xu H; Xie K
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prognostic significance of heart rate accelerations of the fetus in the first stage of labor].
    Csapó Z; Szendei G; Szócska A; Csömör S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(24):1493-500. PubMed ID: 3577454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal tachycardia as an indicator of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Hager WD; Pauly TH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Aug; 66(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 4022482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean section for fetal distress.
    Nageotte MP
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Dec; 28(4):770-81. PubMed ID: 4075630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Premature rupture of fetal membranes in premature labor. Diagnosis and therapy].
    Kirschbaum M; Hermsteiner M
    Gynakologe; 1995 Jun; 28(3):142-52. PubMed ID: 7657174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Untimely rupture of fetal membranes].
    Arch Gynecol; 1985; 238(1-4):217-25. PubMed ID: 4073948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cesarean section: changing indications, rates and perinatal mortality].
    Jimbo T; Kaneko Y; Mizuno M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Sep; 38(9):1664-9. PubMed ID: 3772209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Perinatal infant mortality. Report on 13,801 deliveries].
    Bauer O; Weidenbach A; Thieme R
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1967 Jan; 109(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 6071805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FOETAL HEART RATE DURING THE THIRD TRIMESTER OF TOXAEMIC PREGNANCY AND IN FOETAL DISTRESS BEFORE THE ONSET OF LABOUR.
    JOELSSON I; WESTIN B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1964; 43():338-51. PubMed ID: 14286005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of scalp sampling on the cesarean section rate for fetal distress.
    Zalar RW; Quilligan EJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 135(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 38669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R; Crane J; Hamilton E; Hughes O; Kuling S; MacKinnon C; McNamara H; Milne K; Richardson B; Trépanie MJ; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. PubMed ID: 12196876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.