These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7806479)

  • 21. [A study on the correlation between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Xue X; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Apr; 17(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 12838856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression.
    Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions.
    Stover L; Norton SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2670-81. PubMed ID: 8270743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Assessment of otoacoustic emission usefulness for early detection of hearing impairment caused by noise].
    Trybalska G; Namysłowski G; Morawski K
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 10391046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Swept-tone transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Bennett CL; Özdamar Ö
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1833-44. PubMed ID: 20968356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interrelation of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Gobsch H; Tietze G
    Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):176-81. PubMed ID: 8226338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission measures to auditory thresholds.
    Balatsouras D; Kaberos A; Karapantzos E; Homsioglou E; Economou NC; Korres S
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Feb; 10(2):MT24-30. PubMed ID: 14737052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of binaural auditory brainstem responses and the binaural difference potential evoked by chirps and clicks.
    Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):85-96. PubMed ID: 12121742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure].
    Plinkert PK; Hemmert W; Zenner HP
    HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.
    Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25350405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Extended frequency range hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emissions in acute acoustic trauma.
    Büchler M; Kompis M; Hotz MA
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Oct; 33(8):1315-22. PubMed ID: 22931865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Intra- and intersubject variability of acoustically evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Dieler R; Shehata-Dieler WE; Klagges T; Moser LM
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Jun; 78(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 10439354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss.
    Maloff ES; Hood LJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 24441741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic enhancement of electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: experiment results.
    Xue S; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 8276728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contralateral frequency-modulated tones suppress transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1998 Mar; 117(1-2):114-8. PubMed ID: 9557982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Within- and Across-Subject Variability of Repeated Measurements of Medial Olivocochlear-Induced Changes in Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Mertes IB; Goodman SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e72-84. PubMed ID: 26583481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.