These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7806479)
21. [A study on the correlation between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions]. Xue X; Zhong N Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Apr; 17(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 12838856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression. Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. Stover L; Norton SJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2670-81. PubMed ID: 8270743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Assessment of otoacoustic emission usefulness for early detection of hearing impairment caused by noise]. Trybalska G; Namysłowski G; Morawski K Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 10391046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)]. Hoth S Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interrelation of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Gobsch H; Tietze G Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):176-81. PubMed ID: 8226338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Correlation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission measures to auditory thresholds. Balatsouras D; Kaberos A; Karapantzos E; Homsioglou E; Economou NC; Korres S Med Sci Monit; 2004 Feb; 10(2):MT24-30. PubMed ID: 14737052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of binaural auditory brainstem responses and the binaural difference potential evoked by chirps and clicks. Riedel H; Kollmeier B Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):85-96. PubMed ID: 12121742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure]. Plinkert PK; Hemmert W; Zenner HP HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats. Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears. Stamper GC; Johnson TA Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25350405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ryan S; Kemp DT Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Extended frequency range hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emissions in acute acoustic trauma. Büchler M; Kompis M; Hotz MA Otol Neurotol; 2012 Oct; 33(8):1315-22. PubMed ID: 22931865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss. Maloff ES; Hood LJ Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 24441741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]