These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7806487)

  • 1. Phase weighting: a method to improve objective detection of steady-state evoked potentials.
    Dobie RA; Wilson MJ
    Hear Res; 1994 Sep; 79(1-2):94-8. PubMed ID: 7806487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective detection of 40 Hz auditory evoked potentials: phase coherence vs. magnitude-squared coherence.
    Dobie RA; Wilson MJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 92(5):405-13. PubMed ID: 7523084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection efficiency of auditory steady state evoked by modulated noise.
    Santos TS; Silva JJ; Lins OG; Melges DB; Tierra-Criollo CJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():125-31. PubMed ID: 27262450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Method for detecting auditory steady-state potentials recorded from humans.
    Champlin CA
    Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 1559907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generation of human auditory steady-state responses (SSRs). I: Stimulus rate effects.
    Azzena GB; Conti G; Santarelli R; Ottaviani F; Paludetti G; Maurizi M
    Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 7607975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-processing of auditory steady-state responses to correct spectral leakage.
    Felix LB; de Sá AM; Mendes EM; Moraes MF
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 181(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 19394362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the power of objective response detection of evoked responses in noise by using average and product of magnitude-squared coherence of two different signals.
    Zanotelli T; Leite Miranda de Sá AMF; Mendes EMAM; Felix LB
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Oct; 57(10):2203-2214. PubMed ID: 31399896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of phase in the detection of auditory steady-state responses.
    Picton TW; Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Van Roon P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1698-711. PubMed ID: 11514253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coherence analysis of scalp responses to amplitude-modulated tones.
    Tucci DL; Wilson MJ; Dobie RA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(3-4):195-201. PubMed ID: 2316342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated detection of auditory response: applying sequential detection strategies with constant significance level to magnitude-squared coherence.
    Antunes F; Zanotelli T; Bonato Felix L
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 58(9):598-603. PubMed ID: 31082276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
    Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of auditory threshold using Multiple Magnitude-Squared Coherence and amplitude modulated tones monaural stimulation around 40 Hz.
    Silva GM; Antunes F; Henrique CS; Felix LB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():71-76. PubMed ID: 29650320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-channel evoked response detection using only phase information.
    Miranda de Sá AM; Felix LB
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Oct; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12951227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase coherence of the middle-latency response in the elderly.
    Ali AA; Jerger J
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 1439505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase stability of auditory steady state responses in newborn infants.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 21422930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stochastic resonance in auditory steady-state responses in a magnetoencephalogram.
    Tanaka K; Kawakatsu M; Nemoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2104-10. PubMed ID: 18621581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory brainstem, middle and late latency responses to short gaps in noise at different presentation rates.
    Alhussaini K; Bohorquez J; Delgado RE; Ozdamar O
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 29378459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory steady-state evoked responses for preterm and term neonates.
    Ribeiro FM; Carvallo RM; Marcoux AM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 19657185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The spectral characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Khachunts AS; Vaganian LG; Bagdasarian RA; Tatevosian NE; Tatevosian IG; Kostanian EG; Bilian RN; Manasian KA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 10752302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.