216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7806759)
1. Government in the examining room: restrictions on the provision of abortion.
Kolbert K; Miller A
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1994; 49(5):153-5, 164. PubMed ID: 7806759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
Koslov TI
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
Benshoof J
JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
Gleeson K
ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class.
Mariner WK
Am J Public Health; 1992 Nov; 82(11):1556-62. PubMed ID: 1443311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
Mcfarlane DR
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appeals court finds Utah late abortion restrictions unconstitutional.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Sep; 4(16):2. PubMed ID: 12320245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
Linton PB
Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
