These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7807409)
1. Reading research critically: threats to internal validity. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1994 Oct; 9(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 7807409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reading research critically: assessing the validity and reliability of research instrumentation--Part 2. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1995 Apr; 10(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7722945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Causality and control: threats to internal validity. Behi R; Nolan M Br J Nurs; 1996 Mar 28-Apr 10; 5(6):374-7. PubMed ID: 8704467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reading research critically: assessing the validity and reliability of research instrumentation--Part 1. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1995 Feb; 10(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 7707251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing and enhancing reliability. Mottola CA Decubitus; 1992 Nov; 5(6):42-4. PubMed ID: 1489514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Video technology. Use in nursing research. Spiers JA; Costantino M; Faucett J AAOHN J; 2000 Mar; 48(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 10846968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity: a concept at the heart of research. Nolan M; Behi R Br J Nurs; 1995 May 12-24; 4(9):530-3. PubMed ID: 7599501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity: controlling for variables in research studies involving high-risk neonates. Thomas KA Neonatal Netw; 1992 Sep; 11(6):97-100. PubMed ID: 1448037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical appraisal. 4. Questioning evidence: its validity and importance. Thompson C NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jun; 3(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10478061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability. Higgins PA; Straub AJ Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Strategies to enhance internal validity in multi-center longitudinal research. Smith CS; Salyer J; Geddes N; Mark BA Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1998; 2(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 9919302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reading research critically. II. An introduction to appraisal: assessing the evidence. Avis M J Clin Nurs; 1994 Sep; 3(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 7834137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reading research critically: results--bivariate regression analysis. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1995 Dec; 10(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 8632375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological issues associated with group intervention research. Murphy SA; Johnson LC Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2006 Dec; 20(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 17145455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to make a questionnaire work. McGibbon G Nurs Times; 1997 Jun 4-10; 93(23):46-8. PubMed ID: 9205358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Translating and adapting measurement instruments for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research: a guide for practitioners. Kristjansson EA; Desrochers A; Zumbo B Can J Nurs Res; 2003 Jun; 35(2):127-42. PubMed ID: 12908201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Porter S J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 17824942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In response to Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60 (1), 79-86. Rolfe G J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):108-9. PubMed ID: 17824944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]