These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7807820)

  • 1. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Peer review--exchange of notes on points of excellence].
    Nakajima R; Sakaguchi M
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):49-56. PubMed ID: 7807820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Patient satisfaction expressed in their notes].
    Takemori C
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):57-63. PubMed ID: 7807821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Staff evaluation helps setting individual goals].
    Munemura M
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):34-40. PubMed ID: 7807818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical practice development model: a framework for the recognition of nursing practice.
    Ladewig NE; Haag BJ; Weber BT
    Aspens Advis Nurse Exec; 1994 Jan; 9(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 8297680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Management and staff--interactive communication].
    Matsuda A
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):41-8. PubMed ID: 7807819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Relative evaluation vs. absolute evaluation].
    Kuroda Y
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):64-71. PubMed ID: 7807822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Improved hospital nursing service through review of routine procedures. Communication with physicians].
    Tanaka K
    Kango; 1994 Jun; 46(6):53-8. PubMed ID: 7807879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance in the provision of hospital care. A model for evaluating nursing care.
    Zimmer MJ
    Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):91-5 passim. PubMed ID: 4815747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nurse participation. Identifying readiness for peer review.
    Recruit Retent Restruct Rep; 1995 Jan; 8(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 7743117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Living and working at the hospital].
    De Wever A
    FNIB; 1981 Apr; 59(2):13-22. PubMed ID: 6907140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three methods of nursing audit.
    Trout F
    Dimens Health Serv; 1974 Sep; 51(9):38-40, 43-4. PubMed ID: 4153529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality care--department-related assessment examined].
    Slootweg I; Mulders S
    TVZ; 1994 Jun; 104(11):350-3. PubMed ID: 8054163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maintaining anonymity in peer evaluation.
    Dickson B
    Superv Nurse; 1979 May; 10(5):21-9. PubMed ID: 254970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Professional inspection: the realization of a general surveillance].
    Chagnon M; Lévesques-Barbès H
    Nurs Que; 1986; 6(5):48-9. PubMed ID: 3640302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Goodbye Holladay Park.
    King S
    Oreg Nurse; 1994 Sep; 59(3):3. PubMed ID: 7970624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality Q&A. How can I motivate my staff members to participate in quality efforts?
    Green E
    Nurs Qual Connect; 1992; 1(5):2. PubMed ID: 1304925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hospitals share nursing success stories.
    McCarty P
    Am Nurse; 1982 May; 14(5):1, 7, 14. PubMed ID: 6918197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Underlying principles of inspection by nurses of a provincial nursing service.
    Mellish JM
    SA Nurs J; 1974 Sep; 41(9):17-24. PubMed ID: 4497325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The path to quality.
    Kelly B
    Nurs N Z (1993); 1994 May; 2(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 8025616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audits could have significant meaning for you.
    Jenkins C
    Ohio Nurses Rev; 1992 Jul; 67(5):3. PubMed ID: 1528564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.