These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7807821)

  • 1. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Patient satisfaction expressed in their notes].
    Takemori C
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):57-63. PubMed ID: 7807821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Peer review--exchange of notes on points of excellence].
    Nakajima R; Sakaguchi M
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):49-56. PubMed ID: 7807820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Staff evaluation helps setting individual goals].
    Munemura M
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):34-40. PubMed ID: 7807818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Management and staff--interactive communication].
    Matsuda A
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):41-8. PubMed ID: 7807819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Goodbye Holladay Park.
    King S
    Oreg Nurse; 1994 Sep; 59(3):3. PubMed ID: 7970624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Relative evaluation vs. absolute evaluation].
    Kuroda Y
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):64-71. PubMed ID: 7807822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Living and working at the hospital].
    De Wever A
    FNIB; 1981 Apr; 59(2):13-22. PubMed ID: 6907140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Directors of nursing report quality care made possible at their small-scale hospitals. Good communication among staff and with administration has produced good work environment].
    Fujimori F
    Kango; 1992 Apr; 44(4):64-9. PubMed ID: 1305227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Improved hospital nursing service through review of routine procedures. Communication with physicians].
    Tanaka K
    Kango; 1994 Jun; 46(6):53-8. PubMed ID: 7807879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Four strategies for keeping patients satisfied.
    Long CO; Greeneich DS
    Am J Nurs; 1994 Jun; 94(6):26-7. PubMed ID: 8203404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between nurse caring and patient satisfaction.
    Wolf ZR; Colahan M; Costello A
    Medsurg Nurs; 1998 Apr; 7(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 9727124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality Q&A. How can I motivate my staff members to participate in quality efforts?
    Green E
    Nurs Qual Connect; 1992; 1(5):2. PubMed ID: 1304925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' evaluation of their care: importance to the nurse.
    Marram GD
    Nurs Outlook; 1973 May; 21(5):322-4. PubMed ID: 4487992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inpatient and ambulatory patient satisfaction with nursing care.
    Ketefian S; Redman R; Nash MG; Bogue EL
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1997; 5(4):66-75. PubMed ID: 10169786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hospitals share nursing success stories.
    McCarty P
    Am Nurse; 1982 May; 14(5):1, 7, 14. PubMed ID: 6918197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient satisfaction as a positive nursing outcome.
    Tervo-Heikkinen T; Kvist T; Partanen P; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K; Aalto P
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2008; 23(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 18281877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The path to quality.
    Kelly B
    Nurs N Z (1993); 1994 May; 2(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 8025616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients' evaluations of nursing performance.
    Marram GD
    Nurs Res; 1973; 22(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 4487957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical practice development model: a framework for the recognition of nursing practice.
    Ladewig NE; Haag BJ; Weber BT
    Aspens Advis Nurse Exec; 1994 Jan; 9(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 8297680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation in nursing].
    Lida Aguilera Sister ; Eva Julia Sister
    Epheta; 1970; 9(31):14-26. PubMed ID: 5200115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.