These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7808276)

  • 1. Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation.
    Macar F; Grondin S; Casini L
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Nov; 22(6):673-86. PubMed ID: 7808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality.
    Casini L; Macar F
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 9421567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time perception, estimation paradigm, and temporal relevance.
    Klapproth F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 1):749-57. PubMed ID: 17688129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal judgments in multi-sensory space.
    Retsa C; Naish P; Bekinschtein T; Bak TH
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():101-112. PubMed ID: 26898372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectancy, controlled attention and automatic attention in prospective temporal judgments.
    Macar F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Sep; 111(2):243-62. PubMed ID: 12227437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional selection dilates perceived duration.
    Herbst SK; van der Meer E; Busch NA
    Perception; 2012; 41(8):883-900. PubMed ID: 23362668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time perception and temporal order memory.
    Brown SW; Smith-Petersen GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():173-80. PubMed ID: 24594383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory and visual stream segregation in children and adults: an assessment of the amodality assumption of the 'sluggish attentional shifting' theory of dyslexia.
    Lallier M; Thierry G; Tainturier MJ; Donnadieu S; Peyrin C; Billard C; Valdois S
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1302():132-47. PubMed ID: 19631618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of audiovisual temporal processing--comparison of temporal order and simultaneity judgments.
    Binder M
    Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():432-47. PubMed ID: 25982561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional capture by spoken language: effects on netballers' visual task performance.
    Bishop DT; Moore S; Horne S; Teszka R
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(17):1611-20. PubMed ID: 24734776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time judgments as a function of clock duration: effects of temporal paradigm and an attention-demanding nontemporal task.
    Predebon J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 2):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10485109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.
    Meck WH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():528-41. PubMed ID: 6588813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of a concurrent motor task on auditory and visual temporal discrimination tasks.
    Mioni G; Grassi M; Tarantino V; Stablum F; Grondin S; Bisiacchi PS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):742-8. PubMed ID: 26965441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of practice and automaticity in temporal and nontemporal dual-task performance.
    Brown SW; Bennett ED
    Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 11963281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional effects on concurrent psychophysical discriminations: investigations of a sample-size model.
    Bonnel AM; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Feb; 55(2):162-79. PubMed ID: 8036098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impaired temporal discrimination within the attentional blink.
    Rolke B; Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1295-304. PubMed ID: 18078221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.