BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7808279)

  • 1. Further constraints on the bizarreness effect: elaboration at encoding.
    Robinson-Riegler B; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Nov; 22(6):702-12. PubMed ID: 7808279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
    McDaniel MA; Dornburg CC; Guynn MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16028582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bizarreness effect: dissociation between item and source memory.
    Macklin CB; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 2005 Oct; 13(7):682-9. PubMed ID: 16191818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bizarreness effect: evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes.
    Geraci L; McDaniel MA; Miller TM; Hughes ML
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1228-37. PubMed ID: 23737359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aging, imagery, and the bizarreness effect.
    Black SR; McCown S; Lookadoo RL; Leonard RC; Kelley M; DeCoster J; Wayde E; Spence SA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):566-91. PubMed ID: 22248375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of perceptual and semantic elaboration in high- and low-imagery sentence recall.
    Walter DA; Fox D
    Mem Cognit; 1981 Nov; 9(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 7329243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bizarreness effect and visual imagery: No impact of concurrent visuo-spatial distractor tasks indicates little role for visual imagery.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1281-1295. PubMed ID: 34351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery.
    Riefer DM; Rouder JN
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 1435263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The bizarreness effect and individual differences in imaging ability.
    Toyota H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):533-40. PubMed ID: 12027349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The bizarre imagery effect and intention to learn.
    Burns DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1996 Jun; 3(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 24213877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of elaboration and relational distinctiveness on sentence memory.
    McDaniel MA; Dunay PK; Lyman BJ; Kerwin ML
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(3):357-69. PubMed ID: 3177699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of processing time on the bizarreness and orthographic distinctiveness effects.
    Gounden Y; Nicolas S
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 22448903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of verbal elaborations on memory in young and older adults.
    Cherry KE; Park DC; Frieske DA; Rowley RL
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Nov; 21(6):725-38. PubMed ID: 8289651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of recall as a function of eidetic imagery.
    Kaylor CW; Davidon RS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1143-8. PubMed ID: 492883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comprehension and recall of sentences by mentally retarded and nonretarded individuals.
    Bilsky LH; Walker N; Sakales SR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Mar; 87(5):558-65. PubMed ID: 6837647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Humour mediates the facilitative effect of bizarreness in delayed recall.
    Worthen JB; Deschamps JD
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 99(Pt 4):461-71. PubMed ID: 18433519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships between personality variables and bizarreness effects in free recall.
    Moss BJ; Worthen JB; Haydel LA; Mahon BD; Savoy SC
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 18510131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do you remember what you imagined you would do in that place? The motor encoding cue-failure effect in sighted and blind people.
    Cornoldi C; Corti MT; Helstrup T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 May; 47(2):311-29. PubMed ID: 8036267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adult age differences in memory elaboration.
    Rankin JL; Collins M
    J Gerontol; 1985 Jul; 40(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 4008880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.