These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7808882)

  • 1. Test-retest reliability of the Dynavision apparatus.
    Klavora P; Gaskovski P; Forsyth R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 2):448-50. PubMed ID: 7808882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Standardized analysis of visuospatial perception. Studies of objectivity, reliability and validity].
    Kerkhoff G; Genzel S; Marquardt C
    Nervenarzt; 1994 Oct; 65(10):689-95. PubMed ID: 7808567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest reliability of three Dynavision tasks.
    Klavora P; Gaskovski P; Forsyth RD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Apr; 80(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 7675601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlations of selected psychomotor and visuomotor tests with initial Dynavision performance.
    Vesia M; Esposito J; Prime SL; Klavora P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Aug; 107(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 18986027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factor structure of the Hooper Visual Organization Test: a cross-cultural replication and extension.
    Merten T
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Jan; 20(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 15620818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance measures of alcohol-induced impairment: towards a practical ignition-interlock system for motor vehicles.
    Matsumura K; Yamakoshi T; Ida T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Dec; 109(3):841-50. PubMed ID: 20178284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Construct validity of various verbal and visual memory tests.
    Larrabee GJ; Curtiss G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):536-47. PubMed ID: 7593474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Common neuropsychological deficits associated with stroke survivors' impaired performance on a useful field of view test.
    Fisk GD; Mennemeier M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Apr; 102(2):387-94. PubMed ID: 16826660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of three visual perception tests used to assess adults.
    Brown T; Bourne R; Sutton E; Wigg S; Burgess D; Glass S; Elliott S; Lalor A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Aug; 111(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 21058584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships between the Digit Symbol test and a noncoding motoric equivalent in assessments of brain-damaged patients.
    LeFever FF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 2038535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The style of processing scale: normative and reliability data.
    Ong YW; Milech D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Dec; 93(3):595-8. PubMed ID: 11806573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance as a function of ability, resources invested, and strategy used.
    Botella J; Peña D; Contreras MJ; Shih PC; Santacreu J
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jan; 136(1):41-69. PubMed ID: 19192850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Construct validity in the Trail Making Test: what makes Part B harder?
    Gaudino EA; Geisler MW; Squires NK
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 7593473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer.
    Edwards JD; Vance DE; Wadley VG; Cissell GM; Roenker DL; Ball KK
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 27(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 16019630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of attention: relationship between psychological testing and information processing approaches.
    Shum DH; McFarland K; Bain JD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Aug; 16(4):531-8. PubMed ID: 7962357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of related perceptual tests.
    Davis D; Eliot J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 2):399-402. PubMed ID: 7808874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diminished performance on response-selection tasks in Type 2 diabetes.
    de Groot PC; Borghouts LB; Adam JJ; Keizer HA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):257-66. PubMed ID: 12705534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construct validity of the Continuous Recognition Memory test.
    Fuchs KL; Hannay HJ; Huckeba WM; Espy KA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 1999 Feb; 13(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 10937648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.