132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7809429)
1. [Non-therapeutic cone: surgical or conservative management?].
Schilling A; Le Cerf P; Rojas I
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(1):3-8; discussion 8-9. PubMed ID: 7809429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The incomplete cone biopsy: a comparison of conservative and surgical management.
Watson AJ; Tuffnell DJ; Lowe JW; Rand RJ; Wilkinson K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Oct; 51(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 8119457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post-cone hysterectomy specimens.
Phelps JY; Ward JA; Szigeti J; Bowland CH; Mayer AR
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 8008307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive factors for residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for CIN III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Tseng JJ; Ho ES
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 11063658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome.
Hartman CA; Bragança JF; Gurgel MSC; Zeferino LC; Andrade LALA; Teixeira JC
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253998. PubMed ID: 34283862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The management of premalignant cervical disease.
Singer A; Jordan JA
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Dec; 5(3):629-57. PubMed ID: 367672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cervical pathology: significance and therapeutic impact of margin status].
Michy T; Leveque J; Loussouarn D; Dravet F; Dejode M; Sagan C; Descamps P; Classe JM
Bull Cancer; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1171-5. PubMed ID: 19091650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
Park JY; Lee SM; Yoo CW; Kang S; Park SY; Seo SS
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathologic risk factors for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization.
Kim HJ; Kim KR; Mok JE; Nam JH; Kim YT; Kim YM; Kim JH; Yun SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 May; 105(2):434-8. PubMed ID: 17303228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization.
Natee J; Therasakvichaya S; Boriboonhirunsarn D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 16519377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive margins after conization and risk of persistent lesion.
Narducci F; Occelli B; Boman F; Vinatier D; Leroy JL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Mar; 76(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 10684702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post-cone hysterectomy specimens.
Townsend DE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Nov; 84(5):898. PubMed ID: 7936537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
