These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7809655)

  • 1. Contradictions in women's health care provision: a case study of attendance for breast cancer screening.
    Ross NA; Rosenberg MW; Pross DC; Bass B
    Soc Sci Med; 1994 Oct; 39(8):1015-25. PubMed ID: 7809655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Access to diagnostic mammography in the San Francisco Bay Area.
    Dinkelspiel E; Chu P; Smith-Bindman R
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008 Jun; 17(5):893-9. PubMed ID: 18537490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic referral patterns for two breast imaging units in Jamaica.
    Soares D; Kirlew K; Johnson P; Reid M
    West Indian Med J; 2007 Mar; 56(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 17910147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of physicians in mammography referral for older Caribbean women in Canada.
    Hyman I; Singh M; Ahmad F; Austin L; Meana M; George U; Wells LM; Stewart D
    Medscape Womens Health; 2001 Oct; 6(5):6. PubMed ID: 11698928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Organized breast screening improves reattendance compared to physician referral: a case control study.
    Makedonov I; Gu S; Paszat LF;
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():315. PubMed ID: 25928416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-attendance of mammographic screening: the roles of age and municipality in a population-based Swedish sample.
    Zidar MN; Larm P; Tillgren P; Akhavan S
    Int J Equity Health; 2015 Dec; 14():157. PubMed ID: 26715453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area.
    Peipins LA; Graham S; Young R; Lewis B; Foster S; Flanagan B; Dent A
    J Community Health; 2011 Aug; 36(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 21267639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic surveillance of asymptomatic breast cancer relatives in general practice: rate of re-attendance and GP- and patient-related barriers.
    Duijm LE; Guit GL; Zaat JO
    Fam Pract; 1997 Dec; 14(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 9476075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
    Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography rates for 20 community-based family practices in Ontario: a full practice audit.
    Swanson JG; Kaczorowski J
    Can J Public Health; 2007; 98(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 17985678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-referral for screening mammography.
    Suter LG; Elmore JG
    J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Oct; 13(10):710-3. PubMed ID: 9798820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of non-attendance from BreastScreen NSW in women who report current mammography screening.
    Taylor R; Ivanov O; Page A; Brotherton J; Achat H; Close G
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2003 Dec; 27(6):581-7. PubMed ID: 14723404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
    Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002.
    Nash D; Chan C; Horowitz D; Vlahov D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 17324096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of physician recommendation in women's mammography use: is it a 2-stage process?
    Hawley ST; Earp JA; O'Malley M; Ricketts TC
    Med Care; 2000 Apr; 38(4):392-403. PubMed ID: 10752971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Screening mammography in Polish female population aged 45 to 54].
    Bińkowska M; Debski R
    Ginekol Pol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):871-8. PubMed ID: 16566361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.
    Sutton S; Bickler G; Sancho-Aldridge J; Saidi G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Feb; 48(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8138773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.
    Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Puri D; Weissman J; Moy B; Kopans DB; Kaine EM; Moore RH; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Tanabe KK; Smith BL; Michaelson JS
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):495-507. PubMed ID: 15274062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.