These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7810799)

  • 1. Soft tissue reconstruction in the shoulder. Comparison of suture anchors, absorbable staples, and absorbable tacks.
    Shall LM; Cawley PW
    Am J Sports Med; 1994; 22(5):715-8. PubMed ID: 7810799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of different suture anchors for the stabilization of anterior labrum lesions.
    Mueller MB; Fredrich HH; Steinhauser E; Schreiber U; Arians A; Imhoff AB
    Arthroscopy; 2005 May; 21(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 15891730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors.
    Leedle BP; Miller MD
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Jan; 21(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 15650671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.
    Cummins CA; Strickland S; Appleyard RC; Szomor ZL; Marshall J; Murrell GA
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Mar; 19(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 12627147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue properties of suture anchors in anterior shoulder reconstructions: Mitek GII.
    Wetzler MJ; Bartolozzi AR; Gillespie MJ; Roth CA; Ciccotti MG; Snyder-Mackler L; Santare MH
    Arthroscopy; 1996 Dec; 12(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 9115556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of bone suture anchor to bone tunnel fixation of tibialis anterior tendon in cadaveric cuboid bone: a biomechanical investigation.
    Fennell CW; Ballard JM; Pflaster DS; Adkins RH
    Foot Ankle Int; 1995 Oct; 16(10):641-5. PubMed ID: 8574377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Staple, Anchor, and Tenodesis Screw for Posterior Tibialis Tendon Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis.
    Aslan L; Gunerbuyuk C; Gedik CC; Sarabi MR; Kilicoglu O
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2024; 63(2):194-198. PubMed ID: 37935326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failure properties of suture anchors in the glenoid and the effects of cortical thickness.
    Roth CA; Bartolozzi AR; Ciccotti MG; Wetzler MJ; Gillespie MJ; Snyder-Mackler L; Santare MH
    Arthroscopy; 1998 Mar; 14(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 9531131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tensile strength of various anchor systems in surgical correction of instability of the shoulder joint].
    Gohlke F; Schneider P; Siegel K; Balzer C
    Unfallchirurg; 1993 Oct; 96(10):546-50. PubMed ID: 8235676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suture anchor strength revisited.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Click JN
    Arthroscopy; 1996 Feb; 12(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 8838726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical performance of Bankart repairs in a human cadaveric shoulder model.
    Mohammed KD; Sonnabend DH; Goldberg JA; Hutabarat S; Walker P; Walsh WR
    Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(6):831-5. PubMed ID: 9850787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.
    Sileo MJ; Lee SJ; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo K; Ben-Avi S; McHugh M; Nicholas SJ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Apr; 25(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19341920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of a double-loaded glenoid anchor configuration: can fewer anchors provide equivalent fixation?
    Kamath GV; Hoover S; Creighton RA; Weinhold P; Barrow A; Spang JT
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jan; 41(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 23211709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of soft-tissue anchors in tendo achilles reattachment.
    Janis L; Lam AT; Espiritu T; Ploot E; Husain ZS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2001; 40(4):195-207. PubMed ID: 11924680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Hapa O; Rapley JH; Barber CA; Bynum JA; Hrnack SA
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Jul; 27(7):895-905. PubMed ID: 21693345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arthroscopic bankart repair: experience with an absorbable, transfixing implant.
    Fealy S; Drakos MC; Allen AA; Warren RF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Sep; (390):31-41. PubMed ID: 11550874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of biodegradable glenoid anchors.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Feb; 24(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 18237708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and novel all-soft suture anchors for glenoid labral repair.
    Mazzocca AD; Chowaniec D; Cote MP; Fierra J; Apostolakos J; Nowak M; Arciero RA; Beitzel K
    Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 22301360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of the relation between number of suture anchors and strength of the bone-tendon interface in a goat rotator cuff model.
    Fealy S; Rodeo SA; MacGillivray JD; Nixon AJ; Adler RS; Warren RF
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Jun; 22(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 16762696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arthroscopic Bankart repair with the Suretac device. Part II: Experimental observations.
    Warner JJ; Miller MD; Marks P
    Arthroscopy; 1995 Feb; 11(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 7727006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.