These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7813222)
1. An analysis of the personal reasons for discontinuing IUD use. Petta CA; Amatya R; Farr G; Chi I Contraception; 1994 Oct; 50(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 7813222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of client characteristics that may affect early discontinuation of the TCu-380A IUD. Rivera R; Chen-Mok M; McMullen S Contraception; 1999 Sep; 60(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 10640159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in three developing countries. Farr G; Amatya R; Acosta M; Ekwempu C; Kisninci H Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8521710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The comparative trial of TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by lactating women. Chen JH; Wu SC; Shao WQ; Zou MH; Hu J; Cong L; Miao L; Wang C; Dong J; Gao J; Xiao BL Contraception; 1998 Jun; 57(6):371-9. PubMed ID: 9693396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Xu JX; Rivera R; Dunson TR; Zhuang LQ; Yang XL; Ma GT; Chi IC Contraception; 1996 Jul; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8804806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and TCu 220C IUDs in four developing country family planning clinics. Farr G; Amatya R; Betancourt JD; David M; Alfonso L; Dacalos E Contraception; 1994 Nov; 50(5):417-29. PubMed ID: 7859451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device. Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of the TCu 380A IUD at six Latin American centers. Petta CA; Amatya R; Farr G Contraception; 1994 Jul; 50(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 7924319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contraceptive efficacy of the Copper T 380A and Copper T 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries. Farr G; Amatya R Contraception; 1994 Mar; 49(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 8200217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand. Reinprayoon D; Gilmore C; Farr G; Amatya R Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9865999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized clinical study of the TCu-380 A and the TCu-200 B. IUDs. Kandil OF; El-sheikha Z; Hamza A Popul Sci; 1991 Jan; 10():35-40. PubMed ID: 12284660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial. Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of the TCu 380A versus TCu 200 IUDs in Nepal. Shrestha M; Hurst C; Farr G; Amatya R; Tucker B; Mcmaham J Asia Pac Popul J; 1995 Jun; 10(2):15-26. PubMed ID: 12319865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative clinical trial of the TCu 380A, Lippes Loop D and Multiload Cu 375 IUDs in Indonesia. Sastrawinata S; Farr G; Prihadi SM; Hutapea H; Anwar M; Wahyudi I; Sunjoto ; Kemara KP; Champion CB; Robbins M Contraception; 1991 Aug; 44(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 1893708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rates and outcomes of planned pregnancy after use of Norplant capsules, Norplant II rods, or levonorgestrel-releasing or copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices. Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz S; Pavéz M; Alvarez F; Brache V; Mishell DR; Lacarra M; McCarthy T; Holma P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Apr; 166(4):1208-13. PubMed ID: 1566771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interactions between intrauterine contraceptive device use and breast-feeding status at time of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: analysis of TCu-380A acceptors in developing countries. Farr G; Rivera R Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 1442918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias. Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices. Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs. Chi IC Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]