118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7813721)
1. Magnetic resonance angiography or IADSA for diagnosis of carotid pseudo occlusion?
Currie IC; Murphy KP; Jones AJ; Cole SE; Wakeley CJ; Wilson YG; Baird RN; Lamont PM
Eur J Vasc Surg; 1994 Sep; 8(5):562-6. PubMed ID: 7813721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive evaluation of collateral blood flow through circle of Willis in cervical carotid stenosis using selective magnetic resonance angiography.
Ito K; Sasaki M; Kobayashi M; Ogasawara K; Nishihara T; Takahashi T; Natori T; Uwano I; Yamashita F; Kudo K
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 23(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 24103664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcranial Doppler sonography and magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of collateral hemispheric flow in patients with carotid artery disease.
Anzola GP; Gasparotti R; Magoni M; Prandini F
Stroke; 1995 Feb; 26(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 7831690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of conventional plus transoral carotid ultrasonography in distinguishing pseudo-occlusion from total occlusion of the internal carotid artery.
Fujimoto S; Toyoda K; Kishikawa K; Inoue T; Yasumori K; Ibayashi S; Iida M; Okada Y
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2006; 22(2-3):170-6. PubMed ID: 16710083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the circle of Willis in carotid occlusion: assessment with phase contrast MR angiography and transcranial duplex.
Miralles M; Dolz JL; Cotillas J; Aldoma J; Santiso MA; Giménez A; Capdevila A; Cairols MA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1995 Nov; 10(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 7489210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complete MR angiography and Doppler ultrasound as the sole imaging modalities prior to carotid endarterectomy.
Saouaf R; Grassi CJ; Hartnell GG; Wheeler H; Suojanen JN
Clin Radiol; 1998 Aug; 53(8):579-86. PubMed ID: 9744583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?
Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC
Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between circle of Willis morphology on 3D time-of-flight MR angiograms and transient ischemia during vascular clamping of the internal carotid artery during carotid endarterectomy.
Lee JH; Choi CG; Kim DK; Kim GE; Lee HK; Suh DC
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 Apr; 25(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 15090341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of carotid endarterectomy on primary collateral blood flow in patients with severe carotid artery lesions.
Hendrikse J; Rutgers DR; Klijn CJ; Eikelboom BC; van der Grond J
Stroke; 2003 Jul; 34(7):1650-4. PubMed ID: 12775888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance angiography minimizes need for arteriography after inadequate carotid duplex ultrasound scanning.
Back MR; Rogers GA; Wilson JS; Johnson BL; Shames ML; Bandyk DF
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Sep; 38(3):422-30; discussion 431. PubMed ID: 12947246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex scanning magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography: a comparative study].
Guo D; Wang Y; Fu W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 80(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11798743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Hammond CJ; McPherson SJ; Patel JV; Gough MJ
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Usefulness of arteriography with multislice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of preocclusive stenosis of the cervical internal carotid artery].
Ibarra-de Grassa B; Romero-Vidal FJ; Muñoz-Martínez V
Rev Neurol; 2003 Oct 1-15; 37(7):632-6. PubMed ID: 14582019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of cine MR velocity measurements in the internal carotid artery with collateral flow in the circle of Willis: preliminary study.
Davis WL; Turski PA; Gorbatenko KG; Weber D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 8347953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pseudo-occlusions of the internal carotid artery: a rationale for treatment on the basis of a modified carotid duplex scan protocol.
Ascher E; Markevich N; Hingorani A; Kallakuri S
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 35(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 11854733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of patients with symptomatic ipsilateral high-grade carotid stenosis.
Turnipseed WD; Kennell TW; Turski PA; Acher CW; Hoch JR
J Vasc Surg; 1993 May; 17(5):832-9; discussion 839-40. PubMed ID: 8487351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
