These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7813897)

  • 1. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On selecting markers for association studies: patterns of linkage disequilibrium between two and three diallelic loci.
    Garner C; Slatkin M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 12508256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
    McGinnis RE
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consanguinity and the transmission/disequilibrium test for allelic association.
    Bennett S; Curnow RN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 11443735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Affected kin-pair IBD methods: genetic models.
    Motro U; Thomson G
    Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(5):317-27. PubMed ID: 1761204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the power of linkage detection by the transmission disequilibrium test and the identity-by-descent test.
    Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bickeböller H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 8787977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomization tests of disease-marker associations.
    Morris AP; Curnow RN; Whittaker JC
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):49-60. PubMed ID: 9066927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exact transmission-disequilibrium tests with multiallelic markers.
    Cleves MA; Olson JM; Jacobs KB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9271708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of varying diagnostic thresholds on affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Kendler KS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):407-19. PubMed ID: 3209053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on the asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage tests.
    Wang K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 68(Pt 4):367-75. PubMed ID: 15225162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: multiple-locus segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers.
    Risch N
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 14971378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests of linkage and heterogeneity in Mendelian diseases using identity by descent scores.
    Chakravarti A; Badner JA; Li CC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 3666434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of the affected-sib-pair method to defect disease susceptibility loci of small effect: an application to multiple sclerosis.
    Suarez B; O'Rourke D; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Med Genet; 1982 Jul; 12(3):309-26. PubMed ID: 6956238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of allelic heterogeneity on the power of the transmission disequilibrium test.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 10642427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of major genes underlying several quantitative traits associated with a common disease using different ascertainment schemes.
    Iyengar S; Calafell F; Kidd KK
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 9433582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.