306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7813897)
1. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
Thomson G; Motro U
Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On selecting markers for association studies: patterns of linkage disequilibrium between two and three diallelic loci.
Garner C; Slatkin M
Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 12508256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
McGinnis RE
Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consanguinity and the transmission/disequilibrium test for allelic association.
Bennett S; Curnow RN
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 11443735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Affected kin-pair IBD methods: genetic models.
Motro U; Thomson G
Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(5):317-27. PubMed ID: 1761204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the power of linkage detection by the transmission disequilibrium test and the identity-by-descent test.
Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bickeböller H
Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 8787977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomization tests of disease-marker associations.
Morris AP; Curnow RN; Whittaker JC
Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):49-60. PubMed ID: 9066927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exact transmission-disequilibrium tests with multiallelic markers.
Cleves MA; Olson JM; Jacobs KB
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9271708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of varying diagnostic thresholds on affected sib pair linkage analysis.
Kendler KS
Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):407-19. PubMed ID: 3209053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A note on the asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage tests.
Wang K
Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 68(Pt 4):367-75. PubMed ID: 15225162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: multiple-locus segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers.
Risch N
Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 14971378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tests of linkage and heterogeneity in Mendelian diseases using identity by descent scores.
Chakravarti A; Badner JA; Li CC
Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 3666434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Power of the affected-sib-pair method to defect disease susceptibility loci of small effect: an application to multiple sclerosis.
Suarez B; O'Rourke D; Van Eerdewegh P
Am J Med Genet; 1982 Jul; 12(3):309-26. PubMed ID: 6956238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of allelic heterogeneity on the power of the transmission disequilibrium test.
Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 10642427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of major genes underlying several quantitative traits associated with a common disease using different ascertainment schemes.
Iyengar S; Calafell F; Kidd KK
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 9433582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
