These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7813994)
1. The ability of dogs to recognize and cross-match human odours. Schoon GA; De Bruin JC Forensic Sci Int; 1994 Dec; 69(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 7813994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of the ageing of crime scene objects on the results of scent identification line-ups using trained dogs. Schoon GA Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15541591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rigorous Training of Dogs Leads to High Accuracy in Human Scent Matching-To-Sample Performance. Marchal S; Bregeras O; Puaux D; Gervais R; Ferry B PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0146963. PubMed ID: 26863620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual human odor fallout as detected by trained canines. Vyplelová P; Vokálek V; Pinc L; Pacáková Z; Bartoš L; Santariová M; Čapková Z Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():13-5. PubMed ID: 24378296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scent of the familiar: an fMRI study of canine brain responses to familiar and unfamiliar human and dog odors. Berns GS; Brooks AM; Spivak M Behav Processes; 2015 Jan; 110():37-46. PubMed ID: 24607363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A first assessment of the reliability of an improved scent identification line-up. Schoon GA J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 9456528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scent lineups compared across eleven countries: Looking for the future of a controversial forensic technique. Ferry B; Ensminger JJ; Schoon A; Bobrovskij Z; Cant D; Gawkowski M; Hormila I; Kos P; Less F; Rodionova E; Sulimov KT; Woidtke L; Jezierski T Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109895. PubMed ID: 31419594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Canine human-scent-matching: The limitations of systematic pseudo matching-to-sample procedures. Hale E Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Oct; 279():177-186. PubMed ID: 28888988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conspecific recognition of pedal scent in domestic dogs. McClanahan K; Rosell F Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17837. PubMed ID: 33082433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do trained dogs discriminate individual body odors of women better than those of men? Jezierski T; Sobczyńska M; Walczak M; Gorecka-Bruzda A; Ensminger J J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):647-53. PubMed ID: 22235814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fears from the past? The innate ability of dogs to detect predator scents. Samuel L; Arnesen C; Zedrosser A; Rosell F Anim Cogn; 2020 Jul; 23(4):721-729. PubMed ID: 32270350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The physical chemistry of odors - Consequences for the work with detection dogs. Goss KU Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Mar; 296():110-114. PubMed ID: 30711845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Right nostril biases to experimental scents in Brown NJ; Reimchen TE Laterality; 2020 Jan; 25(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 31074320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MHC odours are not required or sufficient for recognition of individual scent owners. Hurst JL; Thom MD; Nevison CM; Humphries RE; Beynon RJ Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Apr; 272(1564):715-24. PubMed ID: 15906464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]