These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7814258)

  • 1. Absorbed dose measurements and calculations in phantoms for 1.5 to 50 keV photons.
    Nariyama N; Tanaka S; Nakane Y; Namito Y; Hirayama H; Ban S; Nakashima H
    Health Phys; 1995 Feb; 68(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 7814258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical note: Influence of the phantom material on the absorbed-dose energy dependence of the EBT3 radiochromic film for photons in the energy range 3 keV-18 MeV.
    Hermida-López M; Lüdemann L; Flühs A; Brualla L
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112103. PubMed ID: 25370654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms to internal dosimetry: calculation of specific absorbed fractions of energy for photons and electrons.
    Hadid L; Desbrée A; Schlattl H; Franck D; Blanchardon E; Zankl M
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3631-41. PubMed ID: 20526035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluence to effective dose conversion coefficients calculated for monoenergetic electrons up to 200 MeV in partial exposure geometries.
    Kitaichi M; Katagiri M; Hikoji M; Iwai S; Sumiyoshi T; Sawamura S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 15494361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selected organ dose conversion coefficients for external photons calculated using ICRP adult voxel phantoms and Monte Carlo code FLUKA.
    Patni HK; Nadar MY; Akar DK; Bhati S; Sarkar PK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):406-16. PubMed ID: 21147784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose measurements in inhomogeneous bone/tissue and lung/tissue phantoms for angiography using synchrotron radiation.
    Nariyama N; Namito Y; Ban S; Hirayama H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Mar; 46(3):717-28. PubMed ID: 11277220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmark of PENELOPE code for low-energy photon transport: dose comparisons with MCNP4 and EGS4.
    Ye SJ; Brezovich IA; Pareek P; Naqvi SA
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Feb; 49(3):387-97. PubMed ID: 15012008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculation of photon energy deposition kernels and electron dose point kernels in water.
    Mainegra-Hing E; Rogers DW; Kawrakow I
    Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):685-99. PubMed ID: 15839340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in the calibrated response of LiF, Al2O3, and silicon dosimeters when used for in-phantom measurements of source photons with energies between 30 KeV AND 300 KeV.
    Poudel S; Currier B; Medich DC
    Health Phys; 2015 Apr; 108(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 25706137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a nonhuman primate computational phantom for radiation dosimetry.
    Xie T; Park JS; Zhuo W; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):736-744. PubMed ID: 31784999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
    Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
    Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation.
    Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5105-26. PubMed ID: 16237244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radial dose distribution, dose to water and dose rate constant for monoenergetic photon point sources from 10 keV to 2 MeV:EGS4 Monte Carlo model calculation.
    Luxton G; Jozsef G
    Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2531-8. PubMed ID: 10619236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences among Monte Carlo codes in the calculations of voxel S values for radionuclide targeted therapy and analysis of their impact on absorbed dose evaluations.
    Pacilio M; Lanconelli N; Lo MS; Betti M; Montani L; Torres AL; Coca PM
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1543-52. PubMed ID: 19544770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synchrotron radiation shielding design and ICRP radiological protection quantities.
    Bassey B; Moreno B; Chapman D
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Jun; 35(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 25906251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consideration of the ICRP 2006 revised tissue weighting factors on age-dependent values of the effective dose for external photons.
    Lee C; Lee C; Han EY; Bolch WE
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17183127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of conversion coefficients using Chinese adult reference phantoms for air submersion and ground contamination.
    Lu W; Qiu R; Wu Z; Li C; Yang B; Liu H; Ren L; Li J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2276-2314. PubMed ID: 28234633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monochromatic beam characterization for Auger electron dosimetry and radiotherapy.
    Dugas JP; Oves SD; Sajo E; Matthews KL; Ham K; Hogstrom KR
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S137-41. PubMed ID: 18599232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of synchrotron radiation calculations between analytical codes (STAC8, photon) and Monte Carlo codes (FLUKA, EGS4).
    Liu JC; Fasso A; Prinz A; Rokni S; Asano Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):658-61. PubMed ID: 16604720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal dosimetry with the Monte Carlo code GATE: validation using the ICRP/ICRU female reference computational model.
    Villoing D; Marcatili S; Garcia MP; Bardiès M
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1885-1904. PubMed ID: 28182580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.