These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7814548)
21. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women. Lefebvre J; Laperrière H; Rousseau H; Massé R J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women. Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of urine-based screening strategies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic young males. Shafer MA; Schachter J; Moncada J; Keogh J; Pantell R; Gourlay L; Eyre S; Boyer CB JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(17):2065-70. PubMed ID: 8411573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Chilean men and with urethritis. Usefulness of first catch urine samples]. Romero J; Prado V; Gaete V; Martínez J; Pizarro E Rev Med Chil; 1997 Oct; 125(10):1165-71. PubMed ID: 9609034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Chan SW Pathology; 1993 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 8316503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of verification assays in EIA specimens presumptively positive for Chlamydia trachomatis. Leonardi GP; Stavroulakis AM; Cruz J; Szabo K J Med Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 44(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8642577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Enzyme immunoassay and direct immunofluorescence for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen in male first-void urine. Domeika MA; Bassiri M; Mårdh PA Acta Derm Venereol; 1994 Jul; 74(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 7976101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of microtrak direct test for Chlamydia trachomatis in a prevalence study. Godfrey E; Winn W; Keathley JD Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 Nov; 5(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 3536276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection methods in a low-prevalence population in a primary care setting. Gann PH; Herrmann JE; Candib L; Hudson RW J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1580-5. PubMed ID: 2199520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing. Fonseca K; Megran DW; Anand CM J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 7730479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR in genitourinary specimens from men and women attending an STD clinic. Bhalla P; Baveja UK; Chawla R; Saini S; Khaki P; Bhalla K; Mahajan S; Reddy BS J Commun Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18338709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Non-invasive sampling for detection of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in males utilising urinary leukocyte esterase tests and immunoassays. Domeika MA; Bassiri M; Mårdh PA Infection; 1994; 22(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 8070931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men. Mahony JB; Luinstra KE; Sellors JW; Jang D; Chernesky MA J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Sep; 30(9):2241-5. PubMed ID: 1400986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining confirm Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in swabs and urine below the detection threshold of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay. Krepel J; Laur I; Sproston A; Luinstra K; Jang D; Mahony J; Chernesky M J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Nov; 33(11):2847-9. PubMed ID: 8576331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. TestPack Chlamydia, a new rapid assay for the direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Coleman P; Varitek V; Mushahwar IK; Marchlewicz B; Safford J; Hansen J; Kurpiewski G; Grier T J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Dec; 27(12):2811-4. PubMed ID: 2592542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the Kallested Pathfinder EIA, cytocentrifuged direct fluorescent antibody, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. LeBar W; Schubiner H; Jemal C; Herschman B; Criswell K; Curtin N; Sherbeck M Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2013206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Molecular techniques for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Peterson EM; Oda R; Alexander R; Greenwood JR; de la Maza LM J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2359-63. PubMed ID: 2584383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Value of confirmation of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay results in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Hallander H; Jonsson P; Gästrin B Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Jun; 11(6):550-2. PubMed ID: 1526241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent-antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Dean D; Ferrero D; McCarthy M J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jan; 36(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9431928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence applied in specimens originating in remote areas. Williams T; Maniar AC; Brunham RC; Hammond GW J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):1053-4. PubMed ID: 3905845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]