These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7815679)

  • 1. Evaluation of "closed" vs "open" systems for the delivery of peptide-based enteral diets.
    Wagner DR; Elmore MF; Knoll DM
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1994; 18(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 7815679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of sites of bacterial contamination in an enteral feeding system.
    Mathus-Vliegen EM; Bredius MW; Binnekade JM
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2006; 30(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 17047178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbial contamination of enteral feeding products in thermoneutral and hyperthermal ICU environments.
    Perry J; Stankorb SM; Salgueiro M
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2015 Feb; 30(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25118176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlling bacterial contamination of an enteral formula through the use of a unique closed system: contamination, enteral formulas, closed system.
    Dentinger B; Faucher KJ; Ostrom SM; Schmidl MK
    Nutrition; 1995; 11(6):747-50. PubMed ID: 8719133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contamination of gastrostomy feeding systems in children in a home-based enteral nutrition program.
    Bott L; Husson MO; Guimber D; Michaud L; Arnaud-Battandier F; Turck D; Gottrand F
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2001 Sep; 33(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 11593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective study of the impact of open and closed infusion systems on rates of central venous catheter-associated bacteremia.
    Rosenthal VD; Maki DG
    Am J Infect Control; 2004 May; 32(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 15153924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic impact of switching from an open to a closed enteral nutrition feeding system in an acute care setting.
    Phillips W; Roman B; Glassman K
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 28(4):510-4. PubMed ID: 23736686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A microbiologic study of enteral feeding hang time in a burn hospital: can feeding costs be reduced without compromising patient safety?
    Neely AN; Mayes T; Gardner J; Kagan RJ; Gottschlich MM
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 21(6):610-6. PubMed ID: 17119167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the bacteriological contamination of a closed feeding system for enteral nutrition.
    Chan L; Yasmin AH; Ngeow YF; Ong GS
    Med J Malaysia; 1994 Mar; 49(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 8057993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a closed enteral feeding system under cyclic feeding conditions: a microbial and cost evaluation.
    Moffitt SK; Gohman SM; Sass KM; Faucher KJ
    Nutrition; 1997; 13(7-8):622-8. PubMed ID: 9263253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is a 24-h cyclic closed enteral feeding system microbiologically safe in geriatric patients?
    Lafourcade P; Boulestrau H; Arnaud-Battandier F; Rogues AM; Texier-Maugein J; Pinganaud G; Bourdel-Marchasson I
    Clin Nutr; 2002 Aug; 21(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12135592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial growth in clinically used enteral delivery systems.
    Crocker KS; Krey SH; Markovic M; Steffee WP
    Am J Infect Control; 1986 Dec; 14(6):250-6. PubMed ID: 3099607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of high ambient temperature on contamination and physical stability of one-liter ready-to-hang enteral delivery systems.
    Hsu TC; Chen NR; Sullivan MM; Kohn-Keeth CL; Meints AS; Shott S; Comer GM
    Nutrition; 2000 Mar; 16(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 10705069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrograde (ascending) bacterial contamination of enteral diet administration systems.
    Payne-James JJ; Rana SK; Bray MJ; McSwiggan DA; Silk DB
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1992; 16(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 1640636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hazard analysis and critical control point system approach in the evaluation of environmental and procedural sources of contamination of enteral feedings in three hospitals.
    Lucia Rocha Carvalho M; Beninga Morais T; Ferraz Amaral D; Maria Sigulem D
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2000; 24(5):296-303. PubMed ID: 11011785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of system design on bacterial contamination of enteral tube feeds.
    McKinlay J; Wildgoose A; Wood W; Gould IM; Anderton A
    J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 11170778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of two-liter prepacked enteral diet delivery system: a controlled trial.
    Rees RG; Ryan J; Attrill HA; Silk DB
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1988; 12(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 3134560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Microbial contamination of tube feeding solutions].
    Jørgensen L; Trautner F; Engquist A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jun; 152(25):1824-7. PubMed ID: 2114050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical study of the bacterial contamination of 2 differently prepared enteral feeding solutions].
    Pfenninger E; Grünert A; John U; Wiedeck H
    Infusionsther Klin Ernahr; 1986 Jun; 13(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 3091502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbial contamination of enteral feeding solution and its prevention.
    Oie S; Kamiya A; Hironaga K; Koshiro A
    Am J Infect Control; 1992 Aug; 20(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 1524268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.