These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7816535)

  • 1. Contrasting task demands alter the perceived duration of brief time intervals.
    Sawyer TF; Meyers PJ; Huser SJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Dec; 56(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 7816535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remembered duration: working memory and the reproduction of intervals.
    Dutke S
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Nov; 67(8):1404-13. PubMed ID: 16555592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of short time intervals under different experimental conditions.
    Gurevitch A; Shekerdjiiski S; Mitrani L
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1977; 3(3):65-71. PubMed ID: 612132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interval timing deficits assessed by time reproduction dual tasks as cognitive endophenotypes for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Hwang-Gu SL; Gau SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127157. PubMed ID: 25992899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective duration judgments: the role of temporality and executive demands of concurrent tasks.
    Duzcu H; Hohenberger A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():34-41. PubMed ID: 24176728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Work pattern causes bias in self-reported activity duration: a randomised study of mechanisms and implications for exposure assessment and epidemiology.
    Barrero LH; Katz JN; Perry MJ; Krishnan R; Ware JH; Dennerlein JT
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Jan; 66(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18805887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time perception with and without a concurrent nontemporal task.
    Hemmes NS; Brown BL; Kladopoulos CN
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):328-41. PubMed ID: 15129752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in first- and second-order temporal judgment.
    Corcoran AW; Groot C; Bruno A; Johnston A; Cropper SJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191422. PubMed ID: 29401520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of sleep loss in a combined tracking and time estimation task.
    Bohnen HG; Gaillard AW
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jun; 37(6):1021-30. PubMed ID: 8026449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time perception and time perspective differences between adolescents and adults.
    Siu NY; Lam HH; Le JJ; Przepiorka AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():222-9. PubMed ID: 25086223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involvement of shared resources in time judgment and sequence reasoning tasks.
    Brown SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():92-6. PubMed ID: 23680412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent duration production as a workload measure.
    Zakay D; Shub J
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1115-28. PubMed ID: 9715671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deficits in interval timing measured by the dual-task paradigm among children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Hwang SL; Gau SS; Hsu WY; Wu YY
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 51(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 19754502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of task type and perceived demands on postural movements during standing work.
    Glinka M; Metzger S; Viggiani D; Callaghan J
    Appl Ergon; 2018 May; 69():146-152. PubMed ID: 29477322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information processing and estimation of short time intervals.
    Wilsoncroft WE; Stone JD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):192-4. PubMed ID: 1178405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time perception: manipulation of task difficulty dissociates clock functions from other cognitive demands.
    Livesey AC; Wall MB; Smith AT
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 16934301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of practice and signal energy on duration discrimination of brief auditory intervals.
    Rammsayer TH
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Apr; 55(4):454-64. PubMed ID: 8036124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time Sharing Between Robotics and Process Control: Validating a Model of Attention Switching.
    Wickens CD; Gutzwiller RS; Vieane A; Clegg BA; Sebok A; Janes J
    Hum Factors; 2016 Mar; 58(2):322-43. PubMed ID: 26772605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.